Research Article | Published: 01 December 2007

Phytosociological analysis of the restored Sal (Shorea robusta) plantations and natural sal forest of Tripura

Nidhi Rastogi and Alind Rastogi

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 377-385 | 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2007-1399LL | Cite this article

Abstract

Among the existing activities in managing tropical forests, conservation efforts for Sal (Shorea robusta) forest in Tripura have virtually offered very valuable results. 68 plant species belonging to 41 taxonomic families were identified in such study areas. Remarkable dissimilarity between the stands of the restored coppice crop (7 and 16 years) and natural forest (approx. 45 years) was observed. Ground flora of young coppice crop was enriched with herb species while the density of shrubs and woody climbers was higher in the natural stand. Density per ha of herbs, shrubs and trees varied between 168000-497800, 18800-42112, 1100-2975 respectively. Total basal cover (m2 per ha) of herbs, shrubs and trees ranged between 0.524-0.941, 0.138-0.952, 2.333- 86.295 respectively. In the shrub layer 24.9% to 46.2% of the density and 53.4-81.6% of the Total Basal Cover (TBC) was shared by saplings belonging to economically and medicinally important tree species. It also indicates the regeneration potential of the area. Diversity index (Shannon Wiener Index) varied between 0.918- 0.967 for herbs, 0.743-0.876 for shrubs and 0.859 for trees. Values of Jaccard Similarity index were between 33-80% in herb layer, 22-48% in shrub layer, 14-100% in tree layer. The study brings out that the distribution of most of the species was random to contagious. Important flora viz. Smilax zeylanica, Vitex peduncularis, Ziziphus rugosa were the common species of the plant community on account of intact natural habitat.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Anon. (1975). Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, Agric. Hand Book, U.S. Dep. Agric., 436 pp.

Google Scholar

2. Anon. (2000). Fourth Working Plan for Udaipur Forest Division, Udaipur, Tripura. (From 1999-2000 to 2008-2009).

3. Baduni, N.P. (1996). Growing stock variation in different forest cover types of Pauri Garhwal. Ph.D. Thesis. Forestry Department, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar, Garhwal, India. 261pp.

Google Scholar

4. Champion H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). The Forest Type of India, The Managers of Publications, Delhi, pp.35.

5. Curtis, J.T. and Cottom, G. (1956). Plant Ecology Work Book Laboratory Field Reference Manual. Burgess Pub. (Minnisota Co.), pp. 193.

Google Scholar

6. Deb, D.B. (1981). The Flora of Tripura State, Vol. I and II, Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

7. Jaccard, P. (1912). The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol., 11: 37-50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x

Google Scholar

8. May, R.M. (1975). Pattern of species abundance and diversity. In: Ecology and Evolution of Communities (Eds. M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A. 81-120.

Google Scholar

9. Mishra, A.; Sharma, C.M.; Sharma, S.D. and Baduni, N.P. (2000). Effect of aspect on the structure of vegetation community of moist bhabar and tarai Shorea robusta forest in Central Himalaya. Indian Forester, 634-642.

Google Scholar

10. Misra, R. (1968). Ecological Work Book. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi.

Google Scholar

11. Pande, P.K. (1999). Comparative vegetation analysis and Sal (Shorea robusta) regeneration in relation to their disturbance magnitude in some Sal forests. Tropical Ecology, 40(1): 51-61.

Google Scholar

12. Parthasarathy, N.; Kinhal, V. and L. Kumar, Praveen (1992). Plant species diversity and human impact in the tropical wet evergreen forests of southern Western Ghats. Indo – French Workshop on Tropical Forest Ecosystem: Natural Functioning and Anthropogenic Impact, French Institute, Pondicherry, Nov. 1992.

Google Scholar

13. Shannon, C.E. and Wiener, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication in Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach (Eds. M. Kent and P. Cooker), Belhaven Press (Pinter Publisher), Floral Street, London.

14. Shivnath, Gupta, S.K. and Rajwar, G.S. (1993). Analysis of Forest Vegetation in apart of Garhwal Himalaya, Recent Researches in Ecology, Environment and Pollution, b: 25-45.

Google Scholar

15. Singh, J.S.; Singh, S.P.; Saxena, A.K. and Rawat, Y.S. (1984). The forest vegetation of Silent-Valley, India. Indian Forester, 112: 819-823.

Google Scholar

16. Visalakshi, N. (1995). Vegetation analysis of two tropical dry evergreen forest in Southern India. Tropical Ecology, 36: 117-127.

Google Scholar

17. Whittaker, R.H. (1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant communities, Science, 147: 250-260.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3655.250

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Rastogi, N. and Rastogi, A., 2007. Phytosociological analysis of the restored Sal (Shorea robusta) plantations and natural sal forest of Tripura. Indian Journal of Forestry, 30(4), pp.377-385. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2007-1399LL

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 December 2007

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: