Research Article | Published: 01 September 2003

Diversity, distribution pattern and traditional knowledge of sacred plants in Indian Himalayan region

Sher Singh Samant and Shreekar Pant

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 26 | Issue: 3 | Page No. 222-234 | 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2003-2M0D2C | Cite this article

Abstract

Present study deals with the diversity, distribution and traditional knowledge of sacred plants of the Indian Himalayan Region. A total of 155 species belonging to 70 families and 125 genera have been recorded. Of these 59 species are trees, 30 species are shrubs and 66 species are herbs. Along an altitudinal gradient maximum number of sacred plants (i.e., 118) are distributed in the zone <1800 m; 33 species are native, one species, i.e., Pleurospermum densiflorum is endemic and 14 species are near endemic. Fifteen species have been categorized as Critically Endangered (5 spp.), Endangered (4 spp.), Vulnerable (3 spp.), Low Risk- Near Threatened (2 spp.), and Low Risk- Least Concern (1 sp.). Traditionally, various parts of the plants such as whole plants (78 spp.), flowers (27 spp.), leaves (19 spp.), seeds (8 spp.), roots/rhizomes (11 spp.), stems (7 spp.), wood (6 spp.), fibres (2 spp.), and inflorescence and twig (1 sp.) are used in different religious ceremonies and social rites. Development of an appropriate strategy for the conservation and sustainable utilization of sacred plants is suggested.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Anonymous. (1883-1970). Index Kewensis Plantarum Phanerogamarum Vol. 1-2 (1883-1885) and 15 Suppl. (1886-1970). Clarendon Press, Oxford.

2. Dam, D.P. and Hajra, P.K. (1980). Observation on Ethnobotany of the Mompas of Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. In: Glimpses of Indian Ethnobotany. (Edited by S.K. Jain), Calcutta. p. 107-114.

Google Scholar

3. Dar, G.H.; Virjee; Kachroo, P. and Buth, G.M. (1984). Ethnobotany of Kashmir I- Sindh Valley. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 5: 668-675.

Google Scholar

4. Dhar, U. and Samant, S.S. (1993). Endemic plant diversity in Indian Himalaya. 1-Ranunculaceae and Paeoniaceae. Journal of Biogeography, 20: 659-668.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2845521

Google Scholar

5. Dhar, U. and Siddique, M.A.A. (1993). Ethnobotanical studies and biological diversity of Suru Valley (Zanskar). In:  Glimpses in Plant Research. (Edited by J.N. Govil, V.K. Singh & Shamima Hashmi), Today and Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers, New Delhi. 10: 31-39.

Google Scholar

6. Dhar, U.; Samant, S.S.; Rawal, R.S. and Sharma, S. (1997). Studies on biota and resource use pattern of the natives in Askot Wildlife Sanctuary of Kumaun Himalaya, India. Tiger Paper, 24(4): 12-18.

Google Scholar

7. Dhar, U.; Rawal, R.S. and Samant, S.S. (1998). Wild plant resources and use pattern in Askot Wildlife Sanctuary of Kumaun in the Indian Himalaya: Manifestation of commonness and rarity. In: Biodiversity Conservation in Managed Forests and Protected areas. (Edited by P.C. Kotwal & S. Banerjee), Agro Botanical, Bikaner, p. 128-142.

Google Scholar

8. Gogoi, P. (1998). Orchids in culture and medicine: potentialities of Orchid cultivation and their commerce in Assam. In: Abstract and Article of International Festival of Orchids Workshop and Orchid Show. (Edited by S.N. Hegde), 17-18 April, 1998. p. 14-15.

9. Hajra, P.K. and Baishya, A.K. (1980). Ethnobotanical notes on the Miris of Assam plains. In: Glimpses of Indian Ethnobotany. (Edited by S.K. Jain), Calcutta. p. 161-169.

10. Jain, S.K. (1991a). Dictionary of Indian Folk Medicine and Ethnobotany. Deep Publications, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

11. Jain, S.K. (1991b). Contribution to Ethnobotany of India. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.

Google Scholar

12. Jain, S.K. and Saklani, A. (1991). Observation on the ethnobotany of the Tons Valley region in the Uttar Kashi district of the North West Himalaya, India. Mountain Research and Development, 11(2): 157-161.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3673575

Google Scholar

13. Joshi, H.C.; Arya S.C. and Samant, S.S. (2001). Diversity, distribution and indigenous uses of plant species in Pindari area of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve-II. Indian Journal of Forestry, 24(1): 514-536.

Google Scholar

14. Kak, M.A. (1983). Ethnobotany of Kashmiris. Kahkahshan, 15(1): 1-21.

Google Scholar

15. Koelz, W.N. (1979). Note on the ethnobotany of Lahul, a province of the Panjab. Journal of Crude Drug Research, 17: 1-56.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13880207909083272

Google Scholar

16. Naithani, B.D. (1984 & 1985). Flora of Chamoli. Vol. I-II. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

17. Osmaston, A.E. (1927). A Forest Flora for Kumaun. (Reprinted 1978). International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun.

Google Scholar

18. Pal, G.D. (1984). Observations on ethnobotany of tribals of Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh. Botanical Survey of India, 26(1&2): 26-27.

Google Scholar

19. Pandey, P.C.; Joshi, G.C. and Kandpal, M.M. (1990). Ethnobotany of Kumaun Himalaya. In: Himalaya: Environment, Resources and Development. (Edited by N.K. Sah, S.D. Bhatt & R.K. Pandey), Shree Almora Book Depot, Almora. p. 258-289.

Google Scholar

20. Pangtey, Y.P.S.; Samant, S.S. and Rawat, G.S. (1989). Ethnobotanical notes on Bhotia Tribes of Kumaun Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry, 12(2): 191-196.

Google Scholar

21. Rao, R.R. and Jamir, N.S. (1990). Ethnobotany of the AO and Agami Nagas of Nagaland. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 14(3): 593-609.

Google Scholar

22. Rawat, G.S. and Pangtey, Y.P.S. (1987). A contribution to the ethnobotany of alpine regions of Kumaun. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 11(1): 139-148.

Google Scholar

23. Samant, S.S. (1987). Flora of Central and South Eastern Parts of Pithoragarh District. Vol. I & II. Ph. D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

Google Scholar

24. Samant, S.S.; Rawal, R.S. and Dhar, U. (1993). Botanical hot spots of Kumaun: Conservation perspectives for the Himalaya. In: Himalayan Biodiversity: Conservation Strategies. (Edited by U. Dhar), Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. p. 377-400.

Google Scholar

25. Samant, S.S.; Dhar, U. and Rawal, R.S. (1996). Natural resource use by natives within Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve in Western Himalaya. Ethnobotany, 8: 40-50.

26. Samant, S.S. and Dhar, U. (1997). Diversity, Endemism and Economic Potential of Wild Edible Plants of Indian Himalaya, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 4: 179-191.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509709469953

Google Scholar

27. Samant, S.S.; Dhar, U. and Rawal, R.S. (1998a). Biodiversity status of a protected area of west Himalaya. 1- Askot Wildlife Sanctuary. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 5: 193-203.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509809469983

Google Scholar

28. Samant, S.S.; Dhar, U. and Palni, L.M.S. (1998b). Medicinal Plants of Indian Himalaya: Diversity Distribution and Potential Values, Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital.

Google Scholar

29. Shah, N.C. and Joshi, M.C. (1971). An ethnobotanical Study of Kumaun Region of India. Economic Botany, 25: 414-422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985209

Google Scholar

30. Thapa, K.K. and Chettri, R. (1993). Ethnobotanical Survey of Darjeeling-Sikkim hills. Bulletin of Research Cell, 1(2): 1-7.

Google Scholar

31. Uniyal, S.K.; Awasthi, A. and Rawat, G.S. (2002). Traditional and Ethnobotanical uses of plants in Bhagirathi valley (Western Himalaya). Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 1(1): 7-19.

Google Scholar

32. Yonzon, R.; Mondal, S. and Chanda, S. (1981). A contribution to the ethnobotany of Darjeeling hills. Trans. Bose Research Institute, 44(3): 75-81.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Samant, S.S. and Pant, S., 2003. Diversity, distribution pattern and traditional knowledge of sacred plants in Indian Himalayan region. Indian Journal of Forestry, 26(3), pp.222-234. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2003-2M0D2C

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 September 2003

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: