1. Behect. L. (1991). A physiosociological investigation on the vegetation of suphine mountains (British) Y.Y. universitase Fen-Edebiyat, Fal. Fes Dery C.I. Sayil (in press) van Turkey.

2. Bhatnagar, H.P. (1966). Phytosociological studies in some evergreen (Hallong – Nahor) forests of Assam. Trop. Ecol., 7:8-15.

Google Scholar

3. Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr., 27:325-349.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268

Google Scholar

4. Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). A revised survey of the forest types of India. Govt. of India, Publi. New Delhi.

Google Scholar

5. Deb, D.B. (1960). Forest types studies in Manipur. Indian Forester, 86:94-111.

Google Scholar

6. Devaries, D.M. (1952). Objective combination of species. Acta. Bot. Neerlandica 1:497-499.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1953.tb00026.x

7. De Varies, D.M. (1954). Ecological results obtained by the use of interspecific correlation. European grassland conference. p. 32-36 O.E.E.C. Paris.

Google Scholar

8. Goodall, D.W. (1953). Objective methods for the classification of vegetation, I. The use of positive interspecific correlation. Aust. J. Bot., 1:39-62.  https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9530039

Google Scholar

9. Kershaw, K.A. (1973). Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology: ELBS and Arnold Publications Ltd., London 273 pp.

10. Knight, D.H. (1975). A phytosociological analysis of species – Rich tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama Ecol. Monogr., 45259-284.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1942424

Google Scholar

11. Lee, K.H.; Jo, J.C.; Lee, B.S. and Lee, D.S. (1990). The structure of plant community in forest midge-damaged forest (1) Analysis of the forest community of serisong area by classification and ordination technique. J. Koreal For. Soc., 79(2):173-186.

Google Scholar

12. Menon, A.R.R. and Shah, G.L. (1982). Phytosociological studies of vegetation of Saurashtra (Gujarat): Mutual species correlation studies in the area. Ind. J. Ecol., 5(1):55-63.

Google Scholar

13. Muller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and methods of vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, London, Sydney and Toranto.

Google Scholar

14. Negi, K.S. (1979). Species composition, biomass structure and nutrient relation of an Oak forest, Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

15. Palmer, A.R. (1989). The vegetation of the Karoo nature reserves, Cape province, I.A. Phytosociological. S. Afr. J. Bot., 55(2):215-230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(16)31210-8

16. Rai, S.N. and Procter, J. (1986). Ecological studies on four rainforests in Krnataka, India I. Environment, structure, floristics and biomass. J. Ecol., 74:439-454.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2260266

Google Scholar

17. Ralhan, P.K.; Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Nainital in Kumaun Himalaya. Ind. Nat. Sci.: Acad. B. 49(1):121-137.

Google Scholar

18. Rao, P.S.; Barik, K.; Pande, H.N. and Tripathi, R.S. (1990). Community composition and free population structure in a sub-tropical broad leaved forest along a disturbance gradient. Vegetatio 88(2):151-162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044832

Google Scholar

19. Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya, Vegetatio, 50:3-22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120674

Google Scholar

20. Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1987), Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest association and implications concerning future composition. Vegetatio, 58:61-69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044928

Google Scholar

21. Saxena, A.K. and Singh, S.P. (1984). Population structure of forest of Kumaun Himalaya, Imkplications for Management. J. Environmental Mang., 19:307-324.

Google Scholar

22. Singh, E.J. (1988). Phytosociology, plant biomass, net primary productivity and nutrient cycling in Shiroy hills of Manikpur, Ph.D. Thesis submitted in Life Science Department, Manipur University, Manipur, India.

23. Whittaker, R.H. (1951). A criticism of plant association and climax concepts. North West Ste., 25:17-31.

Google Scholar

24. Williams, W.T. and Lambert, J.M. (1959). Multivarieties methods in plant ecology: I. Association analysis in plant communities. J. Ecol., 47:83-101.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2257249

Google Scholar

25. Williams, W.T. and Lambert, J.M. (1961). Multivariation methods in plant ecology: III. Inverse association analysis. J. Ecol., 49:713-730.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2257234

Google Scholar

26. Yadava, P.S. and Singh, E.J. (1988). Some aspects of ecology of Oak forests in Shiroy Hills, Manipur (North-Eastern India). Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Seri., 14:103-113.

Google Scholar

27. Yadava, P.S. and Singh, E.J. and Sorensang, F.A.I. (1991). Tree population structure of sub-tropical forests of Manipur, North-Eastern India and implications for their regeneration. Rec. Res. Ecol. Env. Pollu., 6:13-23.

Google Scholar