Research Article | Published: 01 March 2005

Genetic Analysis of Cone and Seed Characters among Seed Sources of Deodar (Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) G.Don)

Rajesh Sharma and R. R. Bhalaik

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 28 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 17-21 | 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2005-2W5974 | Cite this article

Abstract

The materials used in this study were obtained from 19 seed sources selected from different geographical areas under the species in the state of Himachal Pradesh. These 19 seed sources were evaluated for variability studies in cone and seed characters. Significant differences (p=0.05) were observed among provenances for cone length, cone diameter and seed weight indicating that a significant amount of genetic variation exists among provenances for these traits. Wide ranges in the means were exhibited for cone weight (79.4-314.40 g), No. of seed (124-230), seed weight (1.5-15.5 g) and No. of scale (120-215). In all cases the standard error were lower than their respective means. All characters were found to have positive and highly significant genetic correlation except cone length and seed weight (0.39). In all the cases genotypic correlations were larger than the phenotypic correlations. The heritability estimates were high for all traits except seed weight (16.26%). The highest values were obtained for cone weight 66.43% followed by cone length 56.73% and cone diameter 53.04%. Cone weight, which recorded highest estimate of heritability also recorded highly significant genetic correlation with all traits. Although heritability estimates in broad sense may give useful indication about the relative value of selection in the materials, heritability along with genetic gain is more useful than the heritability alone in predicting the resultant effect for selecting the best genotypes for a given trait.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Adams, W.T. and Campbell, R.K. (1981). Genetics adaptation and seed source specificity. In: Proc. Workshop: Reforestation of skeletal soils. (S.D. Hobbs and O.T. Helgerson Eds). Medford, Oregon, p. 78-85.

2. Campbell, R.K. (1964). Recommended traits to be improved in a breeding programme for Douglas-fir. Weyerhacuser Co. Forest Research Note.

Google Scholar

3. Falconer, D.S. (1960). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Eight Edition. Ronald Press Company, New York, USA. 365 pp.

4. Gardner, C.O. (1963). Estimates of genetic parameters in cross-fertilizing plants and their implication in plant breeding. In: Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAS-NRC Publ. No. 982, Washington, p. 225-252.

Google Scholar

5. Hanson, C.H.; Robinson, H.F. and Compstock, R.E. (1956). Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean lespedeza. Agron. J., p. 268-272.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800060008x

Google Scholar

6. Hanson, W.D. (1963). Heritability. In: Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Nat. Acad. Nat. Re. Conc. Pub. 982. Washington, DC. p. 125-139.

Google Scholar

7. Johnson, H.W.; Robinson, H.F. and Compstock, R.E. (1955). Estimate of genetics and environmental variability in soybean. Agron J.,47:314-318.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x

Google Scholar

8. Mode, C.J. and Robinson, H.F. (1959). Pleiotropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics,15:518-537.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2527650

Google Scholar

9. Namkoong, G.; Snyder, E.B. and Stonecypher, R.W. (1966). Heritability and gain concepts for evaluating breeding systems such as seedling orchards. Silvae & Genetica, 15:76-84.

Google Scholar

10. Nanson, A. (1968). Perspective of d’amelioration en premiere generation par selection des provenances. Silva Genetica, 17:130-132.

11. Squillace, A.E. (1966). Geographic variation in slash pine. Forest Science Monograph 10. Society of American Foresters.

Google Scholar

12. Singh, N.B. and Chaudhary, V.K. (1993). Variability, heritability and genetic gain in cone and nut characters of Chilgoza Pine (Pine gerardiana Wall.). Silvae Genetica, 42:2-3.

Google Scholar

13. Tiwari, D.N. (1994). A Monograph on Cedrus deodara. ICFRE Publication, Dehra Dun.

14. Volkar, P.W.; Dean, C.A.; Tibbits, W.N. and Ravenwood, I.C. (1990). Genetic parameters and gain expected from selection in Eucalyptus globulus in Tasmania. Silvae Genetica, 39(1):18-21.

Google Scholar

15. Wright, J.W. (1976). Introduction to forest genetics. Academic Press, New York. 46 pp.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-765250-4.50005-8

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Sharma, R. and Bhalaik, R.R., 2005. Genetic Analysis of Cone and Seed Characters among Seed Sources of Deodar (Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) G.Don). Indian Journal of Forestry, 28(1), pp.17-21. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2005-2W5974

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 March 2005

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: