Research Article | Published: 01 December 2009

Soil organic carbon pool under different land uses in Tehri Garhwal district of Uttarakhand

M. K. Gupta

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 585-589 | 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2009-428K6K | Cite this article

Abstract

The concept of carbon sequestration emerged in eighties due to the consequences of steadily increasing level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. No systematic study has been undertaken to estimate the soil organic carbon pool in forests of Uttarakhand, by following uniform methodology for field and laboratory work. This study was conducted in three land uses viz. Forests, Plantations and Horticulture in Tehri Garhwal district. Under forests land use, SOC pool was estimated in Sal, Deodar, Quercus, Chir, Silver fir, Miscellaneous and Kail forests up to 30 cm depth. Under Horticulture land use SOC was estimated in Apple and Letchi and under plantation land use SOC was estimated in Block plantations of Eucalyptus, Chir, Teak and Thuja. Over all 413 soil samples were collected from different locations. Soil organic carbon, bulk density and coarse fragments were estimated in collected samples and SOC pool was calculated by using the equation as suggested by IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF. Maximum SOC pool (140.95 t/ha) was estimated under Deodar followed by silver fir (134.90 t/ha), Quercus 99.18 t/ha, Sal (81.62 t/ha), Chir (73.52 t/ha), Kail (67.11 t/ha), while Miscellaneous forests has the minimum SOC pool (53.88 t/ha) in Tehri Garhwal district. SOC pool was higher (81.81 t/ha) in the soils under Apple orchards as compared to Letchi orchards (49.95 t/ha). Maximum SOC pool was estimated in the soils under Thuja (54.01 t/ha) followed by Teak (39.43 t/ha), Chir (36.68 t/ha) and the least was under Eucalyptus (31.35 t/ha). On an average Tehri Garhwal’s forests have 93.02 t/ha SOC pool while orchards have 65.88 t/ha and plantations have 40.37 t/ha.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Berthold, D. and Beese, F. (2002). Carbon storage in soils after afforestation in relation to management practices. Forst und Holz, 57 (13/14): 417 – 420.

Google Scholar

2. Davidson, E.A., Trumbore S.E. and Amudson R. (2000). Soil warming and organic carbon content. Nature, 408: 789-790.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35048672

Google Scholar

3. Follett, R.F; Paul, E.A. and Pruessner, E.G. (2007). Soil carbon dynamics during a long term incubation study involving 13C and 14C measurements. Soil Science, 172 (3): 189 – 208.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ss.0b013e31803403de

Google Scholar

4. FSI (2005). State of Forest Report 2005. Forest Survey of India, Dehra Dun.

Google Scholar

5. Harmon M.E. and Marks B. (2002). Effects of silvicultural practices on carbon stores in Douglas-fir-western hemlock forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA: results from a simulation model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 32 (5): 863-877.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-216

Google Scholar

6. IPCC (2003). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Published by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC. Publishers Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.

Google Scholar

7. Isichei, A.O. and Moughalu, J.I. (1992). The effects of tree canopy cover on soil fertility in a Nigerian savanna.  J. Trop.  Ecol., 8 (3): 329-338.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400006623

Google Scholar

8. Johnson, D.W., and Curtis, P.S. (2001). Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta analysis. Forest Ecology and Management ,140: 227-238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00282-6

Google Scholar

9. Liski, J., Pussinen, A., Pingoud, K., Makipaa, R., Karjalainen, T. (2001). Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration? Canadian J. For. Res., 31:2004 - 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-140

Google Scholar

10. Paul, K.I; Polglase, P.J.; Nyakuengama, J.G. and Khanna, P.K. (2002). Change in Soil Carbon following afforestation. For. Ecol. Manag. 168: 241 – 257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00740-X

Google Scholar

11. Post, W.M., Pengh, T.H., Emanuel, W., King, A.W., Dale and Delnglis, V.H. (1990). The global carbon cycle. American Science., 78: 310-326.

Google Scholar

12. Rajamannar, A. and Krishnamoorthy, K.K. (1978). A note on the influence of altitude on the physico – chemical characteristics of forest soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 26 (4): 399 - 400.

Google Scholar

13. Ravindranath, N.H. and Ostwald, M. (2008). Carbon Inventory Methods: Handbook for Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Carbon Mitigation and Round wood Production Projects. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6547-7

Google Scholar

14. Singh, J; Borah, I.P. and Baruah, A. (1995). Soil characteristics under three different plant communities of northeast India. Indian For. 121 (12): 1130 – 1134.

Google Scholar

15. Totey, N.G. Bhowmik, A.K. and Khatri, K. (1986). Performance of sal on the soils derived from different parent material in Shahdol forest division, M.P. Indian For. 112 (1): 18 –31.

Google Scholar

16. Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An Examination of Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Sci. 37:29-37.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Google Scholar

17. Wilde, S.A., Voigt, G.K. and Iyer, J.G. (1964). Soil and Plant Analysis for Tree Culture. Oxford Publishing House, Calcutta, India.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Gupta, M.K., 2009. Soil organic carbon pool under different land uses in Tehri Garhwal district of Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Forestry, 32(4), pp.585-589. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2009-428K6K

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 December 2009

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: