Research Article | Published: 01 September 2008

Soil organic carbon pool under different plantations in some districts of Uttarakhand and Haryana

M. K. Gupta and Rajiv Pandey

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 31 | Issue: 3 | Page No. 369-374 | 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-45GJM2 | Cite this article

Abstract

A study was conducted to estimate the soil organic carbon pool under Eucalyptus, Poplar, Shisham and Teak plantations in Haridwar and Dehra Dun, districts of Uttarakhand and Yamunanagar District of Haryana State. Over all, SOC pool under Eucalyptus, Shisham and Teak plantations was higher in the study area in Uttarakhand except Poplar plantation where SOC pool, in the study area in Haryana was higher. It indicated that soils under Eucalyptus, Shisham and Teak plantations were better enriched by soil organic carbon in Uttarakhand as compared to Haryana. The SOC pool in all the plantations in Uttarakhand was statistically different while in Haryana SOC pool among Poplar, Eucalyptus and Shisham were non-significant. SOC pool in Shisham, Teak and Eucalyptus grown in Uttarakhand was significantly different from similar plantation grown in Haryana. Variations in SOC pool in plantation and barren land was also statistically significant in study area of both the states.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. FSI (2003). State of Forest Report. Forest Survey of India. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Dehra Dun.

2. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall India, New Delhi

Google Scholar

3. Joshi, C.S., Singh, R.P and Rao, B.P. (1999). Pattern of leaf litter decomposition in forest plantation of tarai region in U.P. India. Tropical Ecology, 40(1): 99-108.

Google Scholar

4. Khushalappa, K.A. (1985). Nutrient status in Eucalyptus hybrid- Monoculture. Indian J. For., 8(4): 269-273.

Google Scholar

5. Makundi, Willy R. and Sathaye, Jayant, A. (2004). GHG mitigation potential and cost in tropical forestry – relative role for Agroforestry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6: 235-260.  https://doi.org/10.2172/823930

Google Scholar

6. Raiasda, A. and Jayaram, N.S. (1995). Modification of soil properties by Eucalyptus hybrid plantations growing on semi arid ferruginous red soils in India. J. Tropical For., 11(1): 227-233.

Google Scholar

7. Ravindranath, N.H. (2003). Strategy and methods for estimating and projecting carbon stock changes. Paper presented in workshop on “Climate Change Mitigation Project in India” at Bangalore 10th -12th July 2003.

8. SPSS Inc. (1997). SPSS Base Statistics, Version 7.5, SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA.

Google Scholar

9. Walkley, A. (1947). An examination of methods for determining organic carbon and nitrogen in soils. J. Agri. Sci., 25: 598-609.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600019687

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Gupta, M.K. and Pandey, R., 2008. Soil organic carbon pool under different plantations in some districts of Uttarakhand and Haryana. Indian Journal of Forestry, 31(3), pp.369-374. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-45GJM2

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 September 2008

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: