Research Article | Published: 30 July 2022

Evaluation of error and efficiency on tree height measurement using Abney’s level, Rangefinder and Vertex IV

Suchana Aryal, Prashant Paudel, Sandesh Bolakhe, Deepak Mahatara and Prakash Lamichane

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 45 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 1-8 | 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2022-49P4F8 | Cite this article

Abstract

Tree height is one of the basic variables which is used for estimation of growing stock, biomass, carbon stock and site quality. Measuring tree height is expensive, time-consuming, and error prone due to stand structure and efficiency of measuring instruments. Here, we try to explore the errors and efficiencies associated with Vertex, Abney’s level, and Laser Rangefinder for tree height measurement. Standing tree height was measured using all three instruments and the true height was determined with the careful measurement using linear tape after felling. In total 102 trees of Arunkhola community forest of Nawalpur districts were sampled. It was found that the Vertex (0.55 m) and Abney’s level (2.36 m) overestimated the tree height whereas, Rangefinder (-1.65 m) was underestimating. There was significant difference in errors for all the evaluated instruments at 95% confidence interval. However, there was no relation between true height and DBH with difference in measurement for all instruments. Average time required to measure individual trees was 4.15, 2.29 and 0.93 minutes for Abney’s level, Rangefinder, and Vertex respectively. It was estimated that efficiency for Vertex was 4.46 followed by Rangefinder with 22.69 by reflecting Vertex as the most precise and efficient instrument for measuring tree height.

Keywords

Efficiency, Measurement error, Overestimation tree height, underestimation

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Andersen, H.E., Reutebuch, S.E. and McGaughey, R.J., 2006. A Rigorous Assessment of Tree Height Measurements Obtained Using Airborne LiDAR and Conventional Field Methods. Journal canadien de télédétection, 32(5), pp.355-366. https://doi.org/10.5589/m06-030

Google Scholar

2. Avery, Thomas Eugene, and Horold E. Burkhart. 2011. Forest Measurements. 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

3. Bhandari, S.K. and Khanal Chhetri, B.B., 2020. Individual-Based Modelling for Predicting Height and Biomass of Juveniles of Shorea Robusta. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 1(2), pp.133-60.

Google Scholar

4. Bonyad, A. and Mehrdad M., 2015. Transect Sampling Method with K-Tree Fixed Number: A Fast and Accurate Methods to Estimate Quantitative Variables in Open Forests. Forestry Ideas, 21, 2 (50), pp.163-71.

Google Scholar

5. Božic, M., Cavlovic, J., Lukic, N., Teslak, K. and Kos, D., 2005. Efficiency of Ultrasonic Vertex III Hypsometer Compared to the Most Commonly Used Hypsometers in Croatian Forestry. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 26(2), pp.91-99.

Google Scholar

6. Bragg, D.C., 2008. An Improved Tree Height Measurement Techniques Tested on Mature Southern Pines. South. J. Appl. Forestry, 32(1), pp.38-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/32.1.38

Google Scholar

7. Bragg, D.C., 2014. Accurately Measuring the Height of (Real) Forest Trees. Journal of Forestry, 112(1), pp.51-54. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-065

Google Scholar

8. Canavan, S.J. and Hann, D.W., 2004. Measurement Error Characterization. Forest Science, 50(6), pp.743-56.

Google Scholar

9. Canavan, S.J. and Hann, D.W., 2014. Stochasticity and Measurement Error in Forest Models. Oregon.  https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1271.7126

Google Scholar

10. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, C., Cairns, M.A., Chambers, J.Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., Lescure, J.P., Nelson, B.W., Ogawa, H., Puig, H., Riéra, B. and Yamakura, T., 2005. Tree Allometry and Improved Estimation of Carbon Stocks and Balance in Tropical Forests. Oecologia, 145(1), pp.87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x

Google Scholar

11. DFRS, 2015. State of Nepal’s Forests. Forest Resource Assessment (FRA). Department of Forest Research and Survey. Kathmandu. http://frtc.gov.np/downloadfile/state%20%20forest%20of%20Nepal_1579793749_1579844506.pdf

Google Scholar

12. Elzinga, C., Shearer, R.C. and Elzinga, G., 2005. Observer Variation in Tree Diameter Measurements. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 20(2), pp.134-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/20.2.134

Google Scholar

13. Feldpausch, T.R., Lloyd, J., Lewis, S.L., Brienen, R.J.W., Gloor, M., Mendoza, A.M., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Banin, L., Salim, K.A., Affum-Baffoe, K., Alexiades, M., Almeida, S., Amaral, I., Andrade, A., Aragão, L.E.O.C., Murakami, A.A., Arets, E.J.M.M., Arroyo, L., Aymard C., G.A., Baker, T.R., Bánki, O.S., Berry, N.J., Cardozo, N., Chave, J., Comiskey, J.A., Alvarez, E., de Oliveira, A., Di Fiore, A., Djagbletey, G., Domingues, T.F., Erwin, T.L., Fearnside, P.M., França, M.B., Freitas, M.A., Higuchi, N., Honorio C., E., Iida, Y., Jiménez, E., Kassim, A.R., Killeen, T.J., Laurance, W.F., Lovett, J.C., Malhi, Y., Marimon, B.S., Marimon-Junior, B.H., Lenza, E., Marshall, A.R., Mendoza, C., Metcalfe, D.J., Mitchard, E.T.A., Neill, D.A., Nelson, B.W., Nilus, R., Nogueira, E.M., Parada, A., Peh, K.S.H., Cruz, A.P., Peñuela, M.C., Pitman, N.C.A., Prieto, A., Quesada, C.A., Ramírez, F., Ramírez-Angulo, H., Reitsma, J.M., Rudas, A., Saiz, G., Salomão, R.P., Schwarz, M., Silva, N., Silva-Espejo, J.E., Silveira, M., Sonké, B., Stropp, J., Taedoumg, H.E., Tan, S., ter Steege, H., Terborgh, J., Torello-Raventos, M., Van der Heijden, G.M.F., Vásquez , R., Vilanova , E., Vos , V.A., White, L., Willcock , S., Woell, H. and Phillips, O.L., 2012. Tree Height Integrated into Pantropical Forest Biomass Estimates. Biogeosciences, 9, pp.3381-3403. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012

14. Goodwin, A.N., 2004. Measuring Tall Tree Heights from the Ground. Tasforests, 15(June), pp.85-97.

Google Scholar

15. Hunter, M.O., Keller, M., Victoria, D. and Morton, D.C., 2013. Tree Height and Tropical Forest Biomass Estimation. Biogeosciences, 10(12), pp.8385–99. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8385-2013

Google Scholar

16. Husch, B., Beers, T.W. and Kershaw Jr., J.A., 2002. Forest Mensuration, 4th Edition. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, Inc. Hoboken.

Google Scholar

17. Kitahara, F., Mizoue, N. and Yoshida, S., 2010. Effects of Training for Inexperienced Surveyors on Data Quality of Tree Diameter and Height Measurements. Silva Fennica, 44, pp.657-667.

Google Scholar

18. Koch, B., Heyder, U. and Welnacker, H., 2006. Detection of Individual Tree Crowns in Airborne Lidar Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72(4), pp.357-63. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.4.357

Google Scholar

19. Larjavaara, M. and Muller-Landau, H.C., 2013. Measuring Tree Height: A Quantitative Comparison of Two Common Field Methods in a Moist Tropical Forest. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(9), pp.793-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12071

Google Scholar

20. Luoma, V., Saarinen, N., Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Vastaranta, M., Holopainen, M. and Hyyppä, J., 2017. Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes. Forests, 8(38): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8020038

Google Scholar

21. Pariyar, S. and Mandal, R.A., 2019. Comparative Tree Height Measurement Using Different Instrument. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 1(2), pp.12-17.

Google Scholar

22. Paudel, P., 2015. Quantification of Measurement Error by Different Observers (How Do Training and Observers Previous Experience Help to Improve Data Quality in Forest Inventory?). Master Thesis, University of Gottingen.

Google Scholar

23. Paudel, P., Beckschäfer, P. and Klienn, C., 2021. Impact of Training on Different Observers in Forest Inventory. Banko Janakari, 31(1), pp.12-22. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v31i1.37338

Google Scholar

24. Phalla, T., Ota, T., Mizoue, N., Kajisa, T., Yoshida, S., Vuthy, M. and Heng, S., 2018. The Importance of Tree Height in Estimating Individual Tree Biomass While Considering Errors in Measurements and Allometric Models. AGRIVITA Journal of Agriculture Science, 40(1), pp.131-40. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v40i1.1730

Google Scholar

25. Ramón, B., Caciano, T. and Paudel, P., 2016. Error Propagation in AGB Estimation - Comparison of Uncertainty Estimation of AGB Obtained with Different Devices. In The Science Policy Gap Regarding Informed Decision in Forest Policy and Management, ed. Alina Kleinn and Christoph Kleinn Fehrmann, Lutz. Cuvillier Verlag Gottingen, pp.203-13.

Google Scholar

26. Sibona, E., Vitali, A., Meloni, F., Caffo, L., Dotta, A., Lingua, E., Motta, R. and Garbarino, M., 2017. Direct Measurement of Tree Height Provides Different Results on the Assessment of LiDAR Accuracy. Forests, 8(1), pp.1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8010007

Google Scholar

27. Tsega, M., Guadie, A., Teffera, Z.L., Belayneh, Y. and Niu, D., 2018. Development and Validation of Height-Diameter Models for Cupressus Lusitanica in Gergeda Forest, Ethiopia. Forest Science and Technology, 14(3), pp.138-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2018.1482794

Google Scholar

28. Vasilescu, M.M., 2013. Standard Error of Tree Height Using Vertex III. Bulletin of the Transylvania University of Brasov, Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering, 6(2), pp.75-80.

Google Scholar

29. Wang, Y., Lehtomäki, M., Liang, X., Pyörälä, J., Kukko, A., Jaakkola, A., Liu. J., Feng, Z., Chen, R. and Hyyppä, J., 2019. Is Field-Measured Tree Height as Reliable as Believed – A Comparison Study of Tree Height Estimates from Field Measurement, Airborne Laser Scanning and Terrestrial Laser Scanning in a Boreal Forest. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 147(May 2018), pp.132-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.008

Google Scholar

30. West, P.W., 2009. Springer Tree and Forest Measurement (2nd Edition).  Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95966-3

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Aryal, S., Paudel, P., Bolakhe, S., Mahatara, D. and Lamichane, P., 2022. Evaluation of error and efficiency on tree height measurement using Abney’s level, Rangefinder and Vertex IV. Indian Journal of Forestry, 45(1), pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2022-49P4F8

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 07 May 2022

Manuscript Revised on 14 July 2022

Manuscript Accepted on 20 July 2022

Manuscript Published on 30 July 2022

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: