Research Article | Published: 01 June 2011

Clonal Variation for Loranthus infestation in Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.)

Rajesh Panduranga Gunaga, M. Hanumantha, Girish Shahapurmath and R. Vasudeva

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 34 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 203-208 | 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2011-58C64P | Cite this article

Abstract

Dendrophthoe falcata var. pubescens, commonly known as Loranthus is one of the important epiphytic parasites of Teak plantations, which can cause substantial economic losses. It is generally observed that certain clones harbour a higher number of Loranthus than others. However, susceptibility of different Teak clones to Loranthus infestation has not been documented in India. Here we report on the clonal variation for this aspect in one of the Teak clonal seed orchards (CSOs) of Karnataka. All the ramets in the CSO (n=625) were scored for the number of mistletoes on them. A weighted score was developed to assess clonal variation for Loranthus infestation, considering percent ramets infested and the number of mistletoes per individual. Around 37 percent of the ramets in the CSO were infested by at least one parasite, which is akin to the infestation levels among neighboring Teak plantations. However, significant variation for the Loranthus infestation was observed among 24 clones studied. Clones- MySS1 and MySS2 were found to be least infested (i.e. 3.8 and 4.0% ramets), whereas clone- MyHaV2 showed highest Loranthus infestation of 48.1%. Although the influence of origin of clone on the Loranthus infestation was significant, provenancial effect on the trait was weak. Based on the score developed, four clones (viz., MySS1, MySS2, MyHaD2 and MyHaD1) were classified as ‘tolerant’, five clones were under ‘highly susceptible’ (viz., MyHuT4, MyHuT5, MyHuT8, MyHaV4 and MyHaV2) and rest of the 15 clones were ‘susceptible’. None of the clones were absolutely resistant against Loranthus infestation. Perhaps this is the first report on clonal variation for Loranthus infestation in Karnataka. We discuss the plausible reasons for such clonal variation.

Keywords

Parasite, Mistletoe, Ramet, Provenance, Inter-clonal, Biochemical

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Ahmed, M. (1993). Relative resistance of different clones of Populus deltoides to poplar defoliator Clostera cupreata (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). Annals of Forester, 1(1):  1-12.

Google Scholar

2. Anmol, Kumar, Gogate, M. G., Sharma, R. and Mandal, A. K. (1997). Genetic evaluation of teak clones of Allapalli region Maharastra. Indian Forester, 123(3): 187-189.

Google Scholar

3. Ghosh, S.K., Balasundaran, M. and Mohamed Ai, M.I. (1983). Studies on the host parasite relationship of phenerogamic parasites on teak and possible control, Kerala Forest Research Institute Research Report, 21: P. 33.

Google Scholar

4. Gnanaharan, R., Ghosh, S.K. and Balasundaran, M. (1983). Effect of Mistletoe on the strength property of Tectona grandis.  Material and Organis., 18: P. 22.

Google Scholar

5. Griffin, A. R. (1984). Clonal variation in Radiata pine seed orchards. II. Flowering phenology.  Australian Forest Research, 14: 271-281.

Google Scholar

6. Gunaga, R. P. and Vasudeva, R. (2003). Teak Seed Orchards in India: Suggestions for management practices. In: International Teak Conference on Quality Timber Products of Teak from Sustainable Forest Management. Pp. 31.

7. Hanumantha, M., Shahapurmath, G.B., Gunaga, R. P., Patil, R.S. and Shivanna, H. (2003). Infestation status of Dendrophthoe falcata var. pubescens in different aged teak plantations of Uttara Kannada District. Myforest, 39: 281-285.

8. Kedarnath, S. and Matthews, J. D. (1962). Improvement of Teak in India by selection and breeding. Indian Forester, 88: 277-284.

Google Scholar

9. Lyngdoh, N. (2003). Morphological and molecular characterization of Teak (Tectona grandis) clones of Karnataka. A thesis Submitted to Dept. of Forest biology and Tree improvement, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Pp.94.

10. Misra, D. K., Tomoar, U. K. and Emmanuel, C. J. S. K. (1996). Clonal seed orchard and its role quality seed production in forestry. Myforest, 32: 265-272.

Google Scholar

11. Santosh, K. (2002). Infestation dynamics and clonal resistance of Teak to trunk borer (Alcterogystia cadambae Moore; Lipidoptera-Cossidae). A thesis Submitted to Dept. of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Pp. 192.

12. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.C. (1967). Statistical Methods, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. P. 33-65.

13. Vasudeva, R., Rajesh P. Gunaga and Hanumantha, M. (2001). Implication of variation in reproductive traits among teak clones to management and genetics of seed orchards. Advances in Forestry Research in India, 24: 120-135.

Google Scholar

14. Vasudeva, R., Rajesh P. Gunaga and Hanumantha, M. (2003). Implications of clonal variation for reproductive traits to improvement of Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f). Paper presented in International Teak Conference on Quality Timber Products of Teak from Sustainable Forest Management held at KFRI, Peechi, Kerala from 2-5 December 2003. Pp. 40

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Gunaga, R.P., Hanumantha, M., Shahapurmath, G. and Vasudeva, R., 2011. Clonal Variation for Loranthus infestation in Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Indian Journal of Forestry, 34(2), pp.203-208. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2011-58C64P

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 2011

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: