Research Article | Published: 01 June 2002

Amelioration in Sodic Soil by Planting Albizia lebbeck Benth. and Pithecolobium dulce Benth.

R. K. Jain, Bajarang Singh, Neeta Srivastava, K. P. Tripathi and H. M. Behl

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 25 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 114-121 | 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2002-608Z31 | Cite this article

Abstract

Management of degraded sodic soils for crop production has not gained enough momentum due to small land holding, high initial inputs and low yield. If such soils are afforested with the compatible species, after few years the surface layer is ameliorated to an extent, which may support many crops/plants well. In this trail, the effect of two species, i.e., A. lebbeck and P. dulce planted on a modest quality of sodic soil, was observed to characterize the role of amelioration. Both the species are leguminous N fixers and are moderately tolerant to sodicity, which are a prerequisite for species selection while planting on sodic wastelands. Though the observations were taken up to 45 cm depth, the significant changes in soil properties were observed to only 15 cm depth. Soil organic C, exchangeable Ca++ and cation exchange capacity (CEC) increased with plant growth; whereas, pH, exchangeable sodium per cent (ESP) and exchangeable Na+ (cmol/kg-1) decreased markedly. Soil amelioration was greater under A. lebbeck stand than that of P. dulce stand corresponding to the growth and biomass produced by the two species. Vertical root penetration and horizontal root spread were also correlated with the soil amelioration. It was concluded that soil amelioration was about 30-40% during nine years from initial years of planting. At this stage many other crops of economic importance can be introduced, which can be cultivated successfully in agroforerstry land use systems.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Agarwal, R.R. (1959). Potential and economic aspects of utilization of saline-alkali soils. Proceedings of Shimla Seminar on Recent Advances in Agron. And Soil Sci., ICAR.

Google Scholar

2. Bȍhm, W. (1979). Method of studying root system. Ecological Studies. Springer – Verlag, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67282-8_2

3. Chaturvedi, A.N.; Bhatt, D.N.; Singh, U.N. and Gupta, N.N. (1985). Response of certain forest tree species to varying pH levels under pot culture. Van Vigyan, 23:79-84.

Google Scholar

4. Chaturvedi, A.N. and Behl, H.M. (1996). Biomass production trials on sodic site. The Indian For., 122:439-455.

Google Scholar

5. Garg, V.K. and Jain, R.K. (1992). Influence of fuel-wood trees on sodic soils. Can. Journal For. Res., 22:729-735.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-098

Google Scholar

6. Gill, H.S. and Abrol, I.P. (1982). Studies on the evaluation of selected tree species for their tolerance to sodicity and mechanical impedance in a highly sodic soil with particular reference to root growth behaviour. Ann. Rep. CSSR, Karnal, India: 37-41.

Google Scholar

7. Gill, H.S. and Abrol, I.P. (1986): Amelioration by tree. In: Prinsley, T. and Swift, M.J. (eds.), Salt affected soil and their amelioration through afforestation. 43-53 pp. Comm. Wealth Sci. Coun., London.

8. Gupta, R.K. and Rao, D.L.N. (1994). Potential of wasteland for sequestering carbon by reforestation. Curr. Sci., 66:378-380.

Google Scholar

9. Gupta, R.K.; Tomar, O.S. and Minha, P.S. (1995). Managing salt affected soils and water for afforestation. Bulletin No. 7/95. CSSRI, Karnal, India. pp. 23.

10. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice – Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

11. Jain, R.K.; Paliwal, K.; Dixon, R.K. and Gjerstad, D.H. (1989). Improving productivity of multipurpose trees growing on sub-standard soils in India. J. of For., 87:38-42.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/87.4.38

Google Scholar

12. Jain, R.K. (1995). Salt tolerance of tree at varying levels of soil ESP. Range Manag. And Agrofor., 16:95-102.

13. Jain, R.K. and Garg, V.K. (1996). Effect of a decade tree stands on some properties of soil while revegetating sodic wastelands. The Indian For., 122(6):467-475.

Google Scholar

14. Piper, C.S. (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis. The Hossell Press, Adelaide, Australia.

Google Scholar

15. Richards, L. (ed.) 1954. Dignosis and Improvement of Saline – Alkali soils. U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook. 60.

16. Sandhu, S.S. and Abrol, I.P. (1981). Growth response of Eucalyptus tereticornis and Acacia nilotica to selected cultural treatments in highly sodic soils. Indian J. of Agri. Sci., 51:437-443.

Google Scholar

17. Singh, B. (1989). Rehabilitation of alkaline wasteland on the Gangetic plains of Uttar Pradesh, India through afforestation. Land Deg. and Reh., 1:305-310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3400010406

Google Scholar

18. Singh, B. (1996). Influence of forest litter on reclamation of semiarid sodic soils. Arid. Soil Res. and Reh., 10:201-211.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15324989609381435

Google Scholar

19. Singh, G.B. and Gill, H.S. (1990). Raising tree in alkaline soils. Wasteland News, 6:15-18.

20. Singh, G.B.; Singh, N.T. and Abrol, I.P. (1994). Agroforestry techniques for the rehabilitation of degraded salt affected lands in India. Land Degr. And Reh., 5:223-242.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3400050306

Google Scholar

21. Singh, K. and Yadav, J.S.P. (1985). Growth response and cationic uptake of Eucalyptus hybrid at varying levels of soil salinity and sodicity. The Indian For., 11:1123-1135.

Google Scholar

22. Singh, K. (1990). Effect of soil salinity and sodicity on seedling growth and mineral composition of Pongamia pinnata and Araucaria cumminghamii. Trop. Eco., 31:124-130.

Google Scholar

23. Singh, K.; Yadav, J.S.P. and Singh, V. (1991). Tolerance of tgrees to soil salinity. J. of Ind. Soc. of Soil Sci., 39:549-556.

Google Scholar

24. Singh, K.; Yadav, J.S.P. and Singh, V. (1992). Tolerance of trees to soil sodicity. J. of Ind. Soc. of Sci., 40:173-179.

Google Scholar

25. Vimal, R.K.; Madan, M.; Rama, R.V. and Vaudeva, R.P.H.V. (1988). Energy plantation on wastelands: A case study of selected mandals of Visakhapatnum district, A.P. In: Proceedings of the Bioenergy Society 5th Convention and Symposium, October 30-31, Vadodara, India, Bio. Soc. of India. 163-180.

26. Yadav, J.S.P. and Singh, K.S. (1970). Tolerance of certain forest species to varying degrees of salinity and alkali. The Indian For., 96:587-599.

Google Scholar

27. Yadav, J.S.P.; Bhumbla, D.R. and Sharma (1972). Performance of certain forest species on a saline sodic soils. Proceeding of International Symposium on New Development of field of salt affected soils of sub-commission on slt affected soils. Inter. Soc. of Soil Sci. held at Carion. 683-690.

Google Scholar

28. Yadav, J.S.P. (1980). Salt-affected soils and their afforestation. The Indian For., 106:259-272.

Google Scholar

29. Yadav, J.S.P. (1991). Problem and potentials of reforestation of salt affected soils. GCP/RAS/111/NET. Field Document, 14, F.A.O., Bangkok, 1-56.

About this article

How to cite

Jain, R.K., Singh, B., Srivastava, N., Tripathi, K.P. and Behl, H.M., 2002. Amelioration in Sodic Soil by Planting Albizia lebbeck Benth. and Pithecolobium dulce Benth.. Indian Journal of Forestry, 25(2), pp.114-121. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2002-608Z31

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 2002

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: