Research Article | Published: 01 December 2002

Studies on variability of growth parameters in Mulberry (Morus spp.) Germplasm

A. Ananda Rao and A. Tikader

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 25 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 443-447 | 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2002-66JSHE | Cite this article

Abstract

Three hundred and twenty eight mulberry accessions (Indigenous - 212 and Exotics -116) maintained as dwarf trees at base collection of CSGRC, representing different genetic and geographical origin, were evaluated for different yield contributing parameters to estimate the magnitude of variation. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that both the seasons and accessions were highly variable and significant. Higher mean values were recorded for leaf characters in exotic accessions, whereas, for shoot characters in indigenous accessions. Highest co-efficient of variation was recorded for total shoot length and leaf yield; and least for moisture content and moisture retention capacity. Significant positive association was observed between leaf yield/plant with number of shoots, length of longest shoot, total shoot length and internodal distance. The promising accessions identified in the study may be utilized for different mulberry crop improvement programmes.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Dandin, S.B. (1999). Mulberry improvement programmes for sustained productivity under tropics. In: Advances in mulberry sericulture. (Eds. M.C. Devaiah, K.C. Narayanaswamy and V.G. Mariba Shetty). C.V.G. publication, Bangalore, pp. 51-87.

Google Scholar

2. Dandin, S.B. and Sengupta, K. (1988). Mulberry cultivation as high bush and small tree in hilly regions. CSRTI Bulletin, CSB, Mysore, India.

Google Scholar

3. Das, B.C. and Krishnaswamy, S. (1969). Estimation of genotype variation of leaf yield and its traits in mulberry. J. Seric. Sci., Japan, 38: 242-248.

Google Scholar

4. Ito, T. (1963). Nutrition of silkworm. Ind. J. Seric.,1:15-17.

5. Sahu, P.K.; Dayakar Yadav, B.R. and Sarachandra, S.B. (1997). Contribution of shoot yield components on total biomass production in mulberry species. Jour. Non. Tim. Prod., 43(4): 118-122.

Google Scholar

6. Sahu, P.K. and Dayakar Yadav, B.R. (1997). Genotypic differences in moisture content and moisture retention capacity of leaf in mulberry (Morus species). Ind. Jour. Agric. Sci., 67 (11): 536-538.

Google Scholar

7. Susheelamma, B.N. and Datta, R.K. (1995). Breeding for drought tolerance in mulberry. In: B. Sharma et al. (Eds.): Genetic Research and Education: Current Trends and Next Fifty Years. Indian Society of Genetics and Plant Breeding, New Delhi: pp. 641-650.

Google Scholar

8. Susheelamma, B.N.; Kumar, J.S.; Mugili, T.; Sengupta, K.; Padma, M.N. and Suryanarayana, N. (1992). Evaluation of techniques for screening for drought resistance in mulberry. Sericologia, 32(4): 609-614.

Google Scholar

9. Vijayan, K.; Tikader, A.; Das, K.K.; Chakraborty, S.P. and Roy, B.N. (1997). Correlation studies in mulberry (Morus species). Ind. J. Genet., 57 (4): 455-460.

Google Scholar

10. Yokoyama, T. (1974). Text book of Tropical sericulture. (Ed.) Japan Overseas Co-operation Volunteers, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 444-537.

About this article

How to cite

Rao, A.A. and Tikader, A., 2002. Studies on variability of growth parameters in Mulberry (Morus spp.) Germplasm. Indian Journal of Forestry, 25(4), pp.443-447. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2002-66JSHE

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 December 2002

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: