Research Article | Published: 01 June 2006

Impact assessment of exotic plantations of varied ages on edaphic properties of woodland habitat of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve, Tamil Nadu

J. N. Singh

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 29 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 113-124 | 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2006-7681E0 | Cite this article

Abstract

The present investigation is aimed at to study the impact of plantations of exotic species of varied age groups on the edaphic properties in the Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve (NBR), Tamil Nadu. It is observed that the soils, under natural forest possess the high pool of energy contents, organic carbon (3.46% to 5.20%), available nitrogen (0.295% to 0.399%), available phosphorus (0.006%), water holding capacity (105.2% to 115.6%) with proportionate values of porosity and cation exchange capacity. Results further exhibit that the same soils, when brought under monocultures of exotic species belonging to the genera Eucalyptus, Acacia, Pinus, Casuarina, Araucaria and Tectona, etc., they lose their acquired characteristics rapidly. Such results are more apparent in matured (aged) species; however, in young stages these species in association with quickly renewable ground flora help the soils in their gradual recovery. Against soil’s acquired characteristics, their inherent characteristics are excessively loaded with silica contents, sesquioxides and iron oxide. Soils reactions are either slightly or moderately acidic but with aged monocultures pH becomes exceptionally acidic. The vital edaphic characteristics which get highly affected by such plantations are, soils energy materials, soil proteins, pH, water holding capacity, porosity, cation exchange capacity, exchangeable calcium and available phosphorus. Besides, the ecosystem loses its existing water regime permanently at its source. However, results again show that mixed plantation of Eucalyptus globulus + Casuarina equisetifolia + Acacia nilotica proved better in promoting desired edaphic properties.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Allardyee, J. (1836). Remarks on the vegetation of the Nilgherries. Madras J. Lit. and Sc., 4: 67-73.

2. Agrawal, S.C.; Madan, U.S.; Chinnamani, S. and Rege, N.D. (1961a). Ecological studies in the Nilgiris. Indian Forester, 87: 376-389.

Google Scholar

3. Agrawal, S.C.; Chinnamani, S. and Rege, N.D. (1961b). Mixed plantation for effective soil conservation in Nilgiri. Indian Forester, 87: 23-25.

Google Scholar

4. Anderson, J.M.; Proctor, O. and Valiask, H.W. (1983). Ecological studies in four contrasting areas of lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park III. Decomposition process and nutrient losses from leaf litter. Journal of Ecology, 71: 503-528.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2259731

5. Anon. (1990-1991). Ecological science research and training center at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Annual Report 1.4.1991 to 31.3.1992. I.I. Sc., Bangalore.

6. Bentham, G. (1851). Leguminosae inter plant as Nilgherrenses hohenackeri. Linnaea, 24: 642-645.

Google Scholar

7. Bor, N.L. (1940). A List of Grasses of Assam. Ind. For. Rec. (Bot. N.S.), 1: 47-102.

8. Bor, N.L. (1960). Grasses of Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistan. Pergamon, London. p. 767. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196111000-00009

Google Scholar

9. Bist, M.S. (1999). Forest cover dynamics in Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve. Indian Forester, 125 (7): 699-706.

10. Champion, H.G. (1936). A preliminary survey of the forest types of India and Burma. Ind. For. Rec. (N.S.), 1: 1-286.

Google Scholar

11. Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). The Forest Types of India, A Revised Survey. Manager of Publication, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

12. Das, A.K. and Ramakrishnan, P.S. (1985). Litter dynamics in Khasi pine (Pinus kesia) of North-Eastern India. Forest Ecology and Management, 18: 61-72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90125-3

Google Scholar

13. Das, P.K.; Nath, S.; Sahai, R.M.N. and Banerjee, S.K. (1992). Characteristics of soils under different aged plantations of Pinus patula and Cryptomeria japonica in Eastern Himalayas. Indian J. Forest., 15(2): 111-115.

Google Scholar

14. Gupta, R.K. (1962). Some observations on the plants of the South Indian hill tops (Nilgiri and Palni) and their distribution in the Himalayas. Journ. Indian Bot. Soc., 41: 1-15.

Google Scholar

15. Gupta, S.C.; Chinnamani, S. and Rege, N.D. (1967). Ecological relationship between high altitude grassland in Nilgiris. Indian Forester, 93: 164-168.

16. Hooker, J.D. (1907). Botany of India. Imperial Gazetteer of India, 3rd ed., 4: 157-212.

17. Hosur, G.S. and Dasog, G.S. (1995). Effect of tree species on soil properties. J. Ind. Soc. Soil Science, 43(2): 256-259.

Google Scholar

18. Jaydev, T. (1957). Working Plan for the Nilgiris Forest Division for the Period 1st April 1954 to 31st March 1964. Superintendent, Govt. Press, Madras.

19. Jackson, M.L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Google Scholar

20. Jeeva, V. and Ramakrishnan, P.S. (1997). Studies on impact of plantation forestry in Nilgiris Hills of the Ghat on soil quality and nutrient cycling. Tropical Ecology, 38(2): 215-235.

Google Scholar

21. Jha, M.N.; Gupta, M.K. and Dimri, B.M. (1999). Soil organic matter status under different Social Forestry plantations. Indian Forester, 125(9): 883-890.

Google Scholar

22. Jain, A. and Roychoudhury, N. (2000). Nutrient assessment in Teak leaves of different maturity. Indian J. Forestry, 23(2): 155-156.

Google Scholar

23. Khan, H.W. and Nair, M.K. (1993). Effect of tree based farming system on physical and chemical properties of soil. pp. 201-217. In: P.K. Thampan (ed.) Organic in Soil Health and Crop Production. Peekay Tree Crops Development Foundation, Cochin, Kerala, India.

24. Malhotra, P.P.; Tandon, V.N. and Kumar, P. (1985). Biomass production, its distribution and biological productivity in Pinus patula plantations in Nilgiri. Indian Forester, III: 12-21.

Google Scholar

25. Meher-Homji, V.M. (1986). The Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve: Delimitation, Biological diversity and Ecological complexity. pp. 47-59. In: Biosphere Reserves. Proc. of First National Symposium on Udhagamandalam. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.

26. Meher-Homji, V.M. (1989). Deforestation and probable climatic change: A review. pp. 115-129. In: Sujata Gupta and R.K. Pachouri (eds.) Proc. of International Conference on global warming and climate change, perspectives from developing countries. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

27. Meher-Homji, V.M.  (1991). Phyto-climates of Peninsular India. Jour. of Environ. Biol. pp. 179-190.

Google Scholar

28. Meher-Homji, V.M. (1997). Biodiversity conservation priority. Ind. Jour. Forestry, 20: 1-7.

Google Scholar

29. Nair, N.C. and Daniel, P. (1986). The floristic diversity of the Western Ghat and its conservation: A review. Proc. Indian Acad. Sc. pp. 127-163.

Google Scholar

30. Nayar, M.P. and Shastry, A.R.K.  (eds.). (1987, 1988 and 1990). Red Data Book of Indian Plants. Vol. 1-3, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata.

Google Scholar

31. Negi, J.D.S.; Bora, N.K.S.; Tandon, V.N. and Thapliyal, H.D. (1984). Distribution of organic matter in an age series of Eucalyptus globulus plantation in Tamil Nadu. Indian Forester, 110: 802-813.

Google Scholar

32. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis (Reprint for Asia). HANS Publisher, Bombay.

Google Scholar

33. Rechard, L.A. (ed.). (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Hand Book No. 60, U.S.D.A.

34. Shukla, A.K. and Misra, P.N. (1993). Improvement of sodic soil under tree cover. Indian Forester, 119(1): 43-52.

Google Scholar

35. Singh, J.N. (1979). The Great Banyan Tree (Ficus benghalensis L.) Indian Botanic Garden, Howrah - The periodical variation in its soil fertility status. Bull. Bot. Surv. India, 21(1-4): 22-27.

Google Scholar

36. Singh, J.N. and Shastry, A.R.K. (1982). Botanical Studies on Silent Valley-Part-I. Published by Director, Botanical Survey of India, Howrah - 3.

37. Singh, J.N. and Shastry, A.R.K. (1985). Mineral storage and edaphic relationship of a few forage grasses of Similipal Tiger Reserve, Orissa. Indian J. Forestry, 8(2): 114-118.

Google Scholar

38. Singh, J.N. and Ghosh, M.K. (1991). Herbage layer biomass and edaphic status of the Botanic Garden at Shibpore, Howrah. Bull. Bot. Surv. India, 33(1-4): 288-295.

39. Singh, J.N. and Mudgal, V. (1999). Edaphic nature of woodland habitat of Dudhwa National Park, Kheri, Uttar Pradesh - Part - I. Indian J. Forestry, 22(3): 285-291.

40. Singh, J.N. (2002). Edaphic characteristics of woodland habitat of Nokrek Biosphere Reserve, Meghalaya and their relationship with its flora. Indian Forester, (Press).

Google Scholar

41. Singh, J.N. (2003a). Grasses and their hydro-edaphic characteristics in the grassland habitat of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve, Tamil Nadu. Bull. Bot. Surv. India (Press).

Google Scholar

42. Singh, J.N. (2003b). Assessment of chemical characteristics of natural waters of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve (Tamil Nadu) and its impact on ionic properties of the soils. Bull. Bot. Surv. India (Press).

43. Singh, J.S.; Rawat, Y.S.  and Chaturvedi, O.P. (1984). Replacement of Oak Forest with Pine in the Himalaya: Effect on the nitrogen cycle. Nature, 311: 54-56.  https://doi.org/10.1038/311054a0

Google Scholar

44. Wight, R. (1831). Illustration of Indian Botany Principally to the Southern Parts of the Peninsula. Hook. Bot. Misc. 2: 90-210; 3: 84-104; 291-302.

Google Scholar

45. Wight, R. (1840-1850). Illustration of Indian Botany of Figures illustration of each of the natural orders of Indian plants described in the author’s Prodromus Floral Peninsulae, Indiae Orientalis - Madras, 2 Vols.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9603

46. Whitmore, T.C. (1989). Forty years of rain forest ecology: 1948-1988 in perspective. Geo Journal, 19: 347-360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176904

Google Scholar

47. Yadav, J.S.P.; Pathak, T.C. and Mahi, G.S. (1970). Soil investigation in evergreen forest of Western Ghat. Indian Forester, 96: 635-649.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Singh, J.N., 2006. Impact assessment of exotic plantations of varied ages on edaphic properties of woodland habitat of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve, Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Forestry, 29(2), pp.113-124. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2006-7681E0

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 2006

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: