Research Article | Open Access | Published: 31 May 2023

Phytochemical characterization of a leafy liverwort Plagiochila asplenioides using GC-MS analysis

Neha Binwal, Prachi Joshi and Shiv Dutt Tewari

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 45 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 233-237 | 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2023-8044TH | Cite this article

Abstract

The aim of present investigation was to carry out the presence of bioactive compounds found in methanolic extract of a leafy liverwort, Plagiochila asplenioides (L.) Dumort. of the family Plagiochilaceae of Marchantiophyta using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). By comparing the retention time and peak area, 16 major phytochemical compounds were identified. Out of which, Azulene, Phytol, Globulol, L (+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate, and Ethyl iso-allocholate were found to be biologically active. The methanolic extract of P. asplenioides prevails potentially bioactive chemicals that may be significant for phyto-pharmaceutical purposes. The phytochemical characterization of P. asplenioides collected from the Kumaun region of Western Himalayas is being presented for the first time. Future research on compound characteristics, however, will provide invaluable information for developing new drugs.

Keywords

Bioactive Compounds, GCMS, Leafy liverwort, Western Himalayas

INTRODUCTION

Bryophytes are small, green group of surface-dwelling plants that make a significant contribution to the Himalayan biodiversity. These are highly specific group of plants with about 24,000 species distributed worldwide (Hallingbäck & Hodgetts, 2000), making them the second largest group of land plants after angiosperms (Alam, Sharma & Sharma, 2011). Liverworts and mosses are known to synthesize a greater range of secondary metabolites like terpenoids, alkaloids, glycosides, flavonoids, carotenoids, steroids, etc. Particularly, liverworts are well known as a rich source of sesquiterpenes and terpenoids with biological activities such as antifungal, antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant and insecticidal activities (Subin et al., 2021). In recent years with the advancement of the GC-MS technology, discovery of the strong bioactive compounds of these plants have globally attracted the attention. GC-MS technique for analysing the phytochemical characterization and identification of new compounds with medicinal potential against diseases is considered to be the most appropriate and widely used method (Igwe et al., 2015). From the bryophytes, several bioactive substances have been extracted and identified, and they may serve as a source for future promising studies (Dziwak et al., 2022). Even though a single species is known to possess multiple compounds with multiple type of activities. Approximately, over 400 new compounds were isolated from bryophytes (Asakawa, 2007). In spite of the rich potential of Himalayan bryodiversity, very few liverworts and mosses were screened for their phyto-chemical characterization. Therefore, proper phytochemical screening of the potent bryophytes for chemical constituents and for isolating the novel bioactive compounds is of prime importance. 

Keeping this in mind, a preliminary attempt was made to screen phytochemical characterization of a leafy liverwort P. asplenioides belonging to family Plagiochilaceae, flourishing well on the shady, moist, sloppy hill site in Kumaun region of the North-West Himalayas. Literature survey reveals that, there are no reports on the GC-MS analysis of a methanolic extract of the leafy liverwort P. asplenioides. However, few reports are available on the GC-MS analysis of the other bryophytes (Negi, Asthana & Chaturvedi, 2020; Negi, Tewari & Chaturvedi, 2018).

Materials and Methods

Collection of plant samples

The collection of P. asplenioides was made during the rainy season from the shady, moist, sloppy hill site of mixed oak forest at Mukteshwar (2000 m) region of Nainital. The liverwort population was found closely associated with mosses viz., Atrichum undulatum (Hedw.) P.Beauv., Brachythecium buchananii (Hook.) A.Jaeger and Thuidium cymbifolium (Dozy & Molk.) Dozy & Molk. The collected samples were brought to the laboratory in a sealed polyethylene bag. Pure population of a leafy liverwort was morphologically segregated and further examined under the microscope for proper identification. The voucher specimens are kept in laboratory for future reference.

Preparation of Plant Extract

The pure samples were washed thoroughly under running tap water to remove the impurities and was shade dried at room temperature. The samples were then crumbled into powder form by using an electric grinder. The powdered plant sample was extracted with methanol as a solvent for 24 hours 10gm/100ml accordingly, and was further shaken on a rotatory shaker at 280 rpm. The mixture was filtered with Whatman filter paper no. 1. Semi-solid extract was obtained after evaporating the filtrate and stored aseptically in an airtight container in the refrigerator for future use.

GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) Analysis

GC-MS analysis of sample extract was performed by using Trace 1300 GC Triplus RSH autosampler TSQ 8000 Evo Mass spectrometer (Thermo, USA) equipped with TG 5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm), 0.25 μm film thickness of stationary phase, 5% phenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane). This was operated in split (split ratio 10:20) injection mode with an injector temperature of 80°C. Helium was used as a carrier gas with the flow rate of 1.0 mL min-1. The GC oven temperature was programmed as follows: 60°C (hold for 3 min), increased to 200°C at the rate of 8°C min-1 (hold for 5 min), increased to 230°C at the rate of 6°C (hold for 5 min) and finally reached to 290°C (hold for 20 min) at a rate of 10°C min-1. The total run time was 60 min. The ion source and mass interface temperature were set at 230°C and 300°C respectively. The mass spectrometer was operated at an electron energy of 70 eV. The samples were derivatized by using BSTFA as silylation agent. All the samples were analysed in full scan mode of mass in the range of m/z 50-800. 1µL of the sample was injected into a chromatographic system.

The mass spectrometer analyses the eluted compounds at different times revealing the nature as well as structure of the compounds. Interpretation of the mass spectrum of GC-MS was done with the help of a database of the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST). A comparison was made between the mass spectra of the unknown component and spectrum of the known component kept in the NIST Library. To determine the bioactivity of the selected substances, Duke phytochemical and ethnobotanical data was used.



Figure 1.
GC-MS Chromatogram of P. asplenioides methanolic extract

 

Results and Discussion

In the last few years, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has become firmly established as key technological platform for secondary metabolite profiling in plants (Kell et al., 2005). The chemical composition of the plant varies depending upon the choice of solvents used for the extraction procedure and the method used for preparing the extract. It is noteworthy that the difference in the chemical constituents of the plant extract may also be due to the ecological difference such as longitude, latitude, altitude, temperature, humidity, climate, soil, growth stage, collection time, etc.; different conditions influence the metabolic and biosynthetic pathways of the plant, therefore, numerous secondary metabolites will be synthesized under different environmental conditions (Daferera, Ziogas & Polissiou, 2000). The GC-MS chromatogram of P. asplenioides has shown the presence of sixteen different compounds (Table 1) represented by unique retention times and distinct peak areas (Fig. 1). The major components identified were (1,3,3,3-Tetrafluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-propenylsulfanylmethyl)-benzene (RT 7.58), Propella-2,4,7,9-tetraene (RT 10.94), Azulene (RT 16.17), Globulol (RT 18.71), Phytol (RT 20.97), L (+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate (RT 23.14), Phytol (RT 26.53), 2,2,4-Trimethyl-3-(3,8,12,16-tetramethyl-heptadeca-3,7,11,15-tetraenyl)-cyclohexanol (RT 28.23), Eudesm-11-en-1à-ol (RT 30.29), Isolongifolol (RT 34.13 ), Rhodopin (RT 38.80), psi,psi-Carotene, 1,1’,2,2’-tetrahydro-1,1’-dimethoxy (RT 42.31), Ethyl iso-allocholate (RT 45.52), Pregn-5-en-20-one 3,16,17,21-tetrakis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, O-(phenylmethyl) oxime (RT 52.59), 1,2-Bis (1-phenyl-3,6-diazahomoadamantantydene-9) hydrazine (RT 54.81), Cyano colchicine (RT 56.63). Out of total sixteen screened phytochemicals, five compounds namely, Azulene, Globulol, Phytol, L (+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate and Ethyl iso-allocholate were turned out to be potentially bioactive compounds confirmed by Duke’s Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical database and other internet resources (Table 2). So, these bioactive compounds may be used in various pharmaceutical aspects. The effectiveness of these biologically active compounds will be one of the future objectives.

Table 1. Phytochemical characterization of P. asplenioides methanolic extract by GC-MS.

S. No.

R. Time

Molecular Formula

Molecular Weight

Compound Name

Structure

1

7.58

C₁₁H₇F₇S

304

(1,3,3,3-Tetrafluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-propenylsulfanylmethyl)-benzene

 

2

10.94

C₁₀H₈

128

 Propella-2,4,7,9-tetraene

 

3

16.17

C₁₅H₂₄

204

Azulene

 

4

18.71

C₁₅H₂₆O

222

Globulol

 

5

20.97

C₂₂H₄₂O₂

338

Phytol acetate

 

6

23.14

C₃₈H₆₈O₈

652

L (+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate

 

7

26.53

C₂₀H₄₀O

296

Phytol

 

8

28.23

C₃₀H₅₂O

428

2,2,4-Trimethyl-3-(3,8,12,16-tetramethyl-
heptadeca-3,7,11,15-tetraenyl)-cyclohexanol

 

9

30.29

C₁₅H₂₆O

222

Eudesm-11-en-1à-ol

 

10

34.13

C₁₅H₂₆O

222

Isolongifolol

 

11

38.80

C₄₀H₅₈O

554

Rhodopin

 

12

42.31

C₄₂H₆₄O₂

600

psi,psi-Carotene, 1,1',2,2'-tetrahydro-
1,1'-dimethoxy

 

13

45.52

C₂₆H₄₄O₅

436

Ethyl iso-allocholate

 

14

52.59

C₄₀H₇₁NO₅Si₄

757

Pregn-5-en-20-one, 3,16,17,21-tetrakis
[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, O-(phenylmethyl)
oxime

 

15

54.81

C₃₀H₃₆N₆

480

1,2-Bis
(1-phenyl-3,6-diazahomoadamantantydene-9) hydrazine

 

16

56.63

C₂₃H₂₄N₂O₆

424

Cyano colchicine

 

 

Table 2. Biological Activity of Phyto components identified in the methanolic extract of leafy liverwort P. asplenioides

S. No.

Compound Name

Biological Activity

1.

Azulene

Antimicrobial, Antihelmintic, Antifeedant, Anti-inflammatory

2.

Globulol

Antimicrobial Activity (Tan et al., 2008)

3.

L (+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate

Antimicrobial Activity (Karthikeyan et al., 2014)

4.

Phytol

Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, Anti-allergic (Ghaneian et al., 2015)

5.

Ethyl iso allocholate

Anti-microbial, Diuretic, Anti-inflammatory, Antiasthma Activity
(Muthulakshmi, Jothibai & Mohan, 2012)

 

Conclusion

The findings of the present investigation suggest that methanolic extract of P. asplenioides was suitable to identify the various phytochemical compounds present in the plant. The crude extract of the studied plant also showed significant biologically active compounds, this indicates the great phytochemical potential of the Himalayan bryophytes. Thus, in the future, more bryophytes, liverworts and mosses should be screened so that bryophytes with active biological potential can be documented. The current work is the first attempt to screen the phytochemical constituents of the Himalayan leafy liverwort P. asplenioides. Based on the preliminary results obtained future chemical and pharmacological investigations may be performed to elute the novel bioactive compounds from them which may be useful for the treatment of many diseases. The results obtained indicate that P. asplenioides could be regarded as a plant of phytopharmaceutical significance.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund, New Delhi for providing financial support. We are also grateful to the Principal and Dr Saraswati Bisht, Head of the Department of Botany, Indira Priyadarshini Government Girls Post Graduate College of Commerce, Haldwani for providing laboratory facilities. We also express our gratitude to Dr A.B. Pant, Senior Principal Scientist, CSIR - Indian Institute of Toxicology Research and Dr Satya Narayana for their support in analysing the sample. Thanks, are also due to the Research Scholars of the Bryology Laboratory for their help.

Appendicies

References

1. Asakawa, Y., 2007. Biologically active compounds from bryophytes. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 79(4), pp.557-580.  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200779040557

Google Scholar

2. Alam, A., Sharma V. and Sharma S.C., 2011. Bryoflora of Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan (India). Archive for Bryology, 106, pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

3. Daferera, D.J., Ziogas, B.N. and Polissiou, M.G., 2000. GC-MS analysis of essential oils from some Greek aromatic plants and their fungitoxicity on Penicillium digitatum. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(6), 2576-2581.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990835x

Google Scholar

4. Dziwak, M., Wróblewska, K., Szummy, A. and Galek, R., 2022. Modern use of bryophytes as a source of secondary metabolites. Agronomy, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061456

Google Scholar

5. Ghaneian, M.T., Ehrampoush, M.H., Jebali, A., Hekmatimoghaddam, S. and Mahmoudi, M., 2015. Antimicrobial activity, toxicity and stability of phytol as a novel surface disinfectant. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 2(1), pp.13-16.

Google Scholar

6. Hallingbäck, T. and Hodgetts, N., 2000. Mosses, liverworts and hornworts: Status survey and conservation action plan for bryophytes. IUCN/SSC Bryophyte Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

Google Scholar

7. Igwe, K.K., Nwankwo, P.O., Otuokere, I.E., Ijioma, S.N., Amaku, F.J. and Chika, I., 2015. Identification of the Phytocomponents in Loranthus micranthus methanolic extract by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. International Journal of Research Science and Management, 2(12), pp.53-56.

Google Scholar

8. Karthikeyan, S.C., Velmurugan, S., Donio, M.B.S., Michaelbabu, M. and Citarasu, T., 2014. Studies on the antimicrobial potential and structural characterization of fatty acids extracted from Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea glomerata. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-014-0057-x

Google Scholar

9. Kell, D.B., Brown, M., Davey, H.M., Dunn, W.B., Spasic, I. and Oliver, S.G., 2005. Metabolic footprinting and systems biology: The medium is the message. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, pp.557-565.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1177

Google Scholar

10. Muthulakshmi, A.R., Jothibai, M.R. and Mohan, V.R., 2012. GC-MS Analysis of Bioactive Components of Feronia elephantum Correa (Rutaceae). Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 2(2), pp.69-74.

Google Scholar

11. Negi, K., Asthana, A.K. and Chaturvedi, P., 2020. GC-MS analysis and antifungal activity of acetone extract of Conocephalum conicum (L) Underw (Liverwort) against aflatoxins producing fungi. South African Journal of Botany, 131, pp.384-390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.02.035

Google Scholar

12. Negi, K., Tewari, S.D. and Chaturvedi, P., 2018. Antibacterial activity of Marchantia papillata Raddi subsp. grossibarba (Steph.) Bischl. Against Staphylococcus aureus. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 17(4), pp.763-769.

Google Scholar

13. Subin, K., Jose, P.A., Tom, B., Nair, B. and Manju, C.N., 2021. GC-MS analysis of a fragrant epiphyllous liverwort Leptolejeunea balansae from Western Ghats, India. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 13(3), pp.115-118.  https://doi.org/10.52711/0975-4385.2021.00019

Google Scholar

14. Tan, M., Zhou, L., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Hao, X. and Wang, J., 2008. Antimicrobial Activity of Globulol isolated from the fruits of Eucalptus globulus Labill. Natural Product Research, 22(7), pp.569-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786410701592745

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Binwal, N., Joshi, P. and Tewari, S.D., 2022. Phytochemical characterization of a leafy liverwort Plagiochila asplenioides using GC-MS analysis. Indian Journal of Forestry, 45(4), pp.233-237. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2023-8044TH

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 30 March 2023

Manuscript Revised on 15 May 2023

Manuscript Accepted on 18 May 2023

Manuscript Published on 31 May 2023

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: