Invited Commentary | Published: 07 January 2021

Forestry Research in Mine Reclamation in India: Past, Present and Future 

Sanjay Singh

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 43 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 10-18 | 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-82P483 | Cite this article

Abstract

Minerals greatly influence the economic growth of any country. However, extensive mining can adversely affect the natural environment in the form of loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, contamination of surface and ground water. Therefore, restoration and reclamation of mined sites become priority areas of intervention. This review paper deals with history, current status and priorities of forestry research in the area of mine reclamation in India. The foresters need to align their activities in line with the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration during 2021-2030.

Keywords

Ecosystem restoration, Leguminous plants, Macronutrients, Mine reclamation, Reclamation of soil

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Abrol, I.P., 1986. Fuel and forage production from salt affected wasteland in India. Reclamation and Revegetation Research, 5, pp.65-74

Google Scholar

2. Banerjee, S.K. and Gupta B.N., 1996. Biological Reclamation of Mined Out Land. TFRI Series IV. Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)

Google Scholar

3. Banerjee, S.K., Dugaya, D., Manjhi, R.B. and Nandeshwar, D.L., 1996. Spoil characteristics and vegetation succession in an age series of coal mine spoils as influenced by microsites. Advances in Forestry Research in India, 16, pp.178-216

Google Scholar

4. Banerjee, S.K., Singh, A.K., Jain, A. and Shukla, P.K., 2003. Response of conservation measures on the growth of planted species and improvement in soil properties in a degraded area. Indian For., 129, pp.1504-1516

Google Scholar

5. Banerjee, S.K., Mishra, T.K., Singh, A.K. and Jain A., 2004. Impact of plantation on ecosystem development in disturbed coal mine overburden spoils. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 16, pp.294-307

Google Scholar

6. Bhowmik, A.K. and Jain, A., 2008. Evaluation of forest tree species in pot culture using limestone mine spoil. Indian Agric., 52, pp.151-157

Google Scholar

7. Bhowmik, A.K., Mishra, A.K., Mishra, P.N. and Banerjee, S.K.,1996. Performance of different NFT and Non-NFT species on Iron Mine Overburden. Environment & Ecology, 14, pp.607-611

Google Scholar

8. Bradshaw, A.D. and Chadwick, M.J., 1980. The Reconstruction of Land. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford

Google Scholar

9. Chaney, R.L., Angle, J.S., Broadhurst, C.L., Peters, C.A., Tappero, R.V. and Donald, L.S., 2007. Improved understanding of hyperaccumulation yields commercial phytoextraction and phytomining technologies. Journal Environmental Quality, 36, pp.1429-1433 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0514

Google Scholar

10. Coates, W., 2005. Tree species selection for a mine tailings bioremediation project in Peru. Biomass Bioenergy, 28, pp.418-423 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe. 2004. 11. 002

Google Scholar

11. Conesa, H.M., Garcia, G., Faz, A. and Arnaldos, R., 2007. Dynamics of metal tolerant plant communities development in mine tailings from the Cartagena-La Union Mining District (SE Spain) and their interest for further revegetation purposes. Chemosphere, 68, pp.1180-1185 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2007.01.072

Google Scholar

12. Connell, J.H. and Slatyer, R.O., 1977. Mechanism of succession and their role in community stability and organisation. Am. Nat., 11, pp.1119-1144 https://doi.org/10.1086/283241

Google Scholar

13. Coppin, N.J. and Bradshaw, A.D., 1982. The establishment of vegetation in quarries and open-pit non-metal mines. Mining Journal Books, London

Google Scholar

14. Dellavalle, N.B., 2020. Determining the Gypsum Requirement for Reclamation of Sodic and Sodium-Impacted Soils. Crops & Soils Magazine, May-June 2020, pp.8-10 https://doi.org/10.1002/crso.20031

Google Scholar

15. Diagne, N., Arumugam, K., Ngom, M., Nambiar-Veetil, M., Claudine Franche, M. Krishna Kumar, N. and Laplaze L., 2013. Use of Frankia and actinorhizal plants for degraded lands reclamation. BioMed Research International, pp.1-9 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/948258

Google Scholar

16. Ghose, M.K., 2005. Soil conservation for rehabilitation and revegetation of mine-degraded land. TIDEE - TERI Information Digest on Energy and Environment, 4, pp.137-150

Google Scholar

17. Gibson, D.J., Johnson, F.L. and Risser, P.G., 1985. Revegetation of unreclaimed coal strip mines in Oklahama. II. Plant, communities. Reclamation & Revegetation Research, 4, pp.31-47

Google Scholar

18. Gitt, M.J. and Dollhopf, D.J., 1991. Coal waste reclamation using automated weathering to predict lime requirement. Journal Environmental Quality, 20, pp.285-288 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1991. 00472425002000010046x

Google Scholar

19. Gould, A.B. and Hendrix, J.W., 1998. Relationship of mycorrhizal activity to time following reclamation of surface mine land in western Kentucky. II Mycorrhizal fungal communities. Canadian Journal Botany, 76, pp.204-212 https://doi.org/10.1139/b97-149

Google Scholar

20. Gould, A.B., Hendrix, J.W. and Ferriss, R.S., 1996. Relationship of mycorrhizal activity to time following reclamation of surface mine land in western Kentucky. I Propagule and spore population densities. Canadian Journal Botany, 74, pp.247-261 https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-030

Google Scholar

21. Gupta, R.K., 1979. ‘Reclamation and use of coal-mined ecosystem in India: a review’, in Wali, M,D. (ed.), Ecology and Coal Resource Development, New York: Pergamon Press https://doi.org/10.1016/B978 -1-4832-8365-4.50071-5

Google Scholar

22. Halofsky, J.E. and McCormick, L.H., 2005. Establishment and growth of experimental grass species mixtures on coal mine sites reclaimed with municipal biosolids. Environmental Management, 35, pp.569-578 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0094-x

Google Scholar

23. HFRI, 2005. Annual   Report 2004-05. Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Shimla

Google Scholar

24. IBEF, 2020. India Brand Equity Foundation. [online] Available at: <https://www.ibef.org/archives/industry/Metals-and-mining-reports/indian-metals-and-mining industry-analysis-october-2019>

25. IPBES, 2018. ‘The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration’, in Montanarella, L., Scholes, R., and Brainich, A. (eds.), Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany

Google Scholar

26. ICFRE, 2020. A Handbook on Mine Reclamation. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun

Google Scholar

27. Jha, A.K. and Singh, J.S., 1990. Vascular flora of naturally revegetated coal mine spoil in a dry tropical environment. J. Trop. For., 6, pp.131-142

Google Scholar

28. Joost , R.E., Olsen, F.J. and Jones, J.H., 1987. Revegetation and Minesoil Development of Coal Refuse Amended with Sewage Sludge and Limestone. Journal of Environmental Quality, 16, pp.65-68 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1987.00472425001600010013x

Google Scholar

29. Jordan, F.L. Robin-Abbott, M. Maier, R.M. and Glenn, E.P., 2002. A comparison of chelator-facilitated metal uptake by a halophytes and a glycophyte. Environment Toxicology Chemistry. 21, pp.2698-2704 https://doi.org/10.1002/etc

Google Scholar

30. Karthikeyan, A., Deeparaj, B. and Nepolean, P., 2009. Reforestation in bauxite mine spoils with Casuarina equisetifolia frost. and beneficial microbes. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 19, pp.153-165 https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2009.9752661

Google Scholar

31. Kundu, N.K., and Ghose, M.K., 1997. Soil profile Characteristic in Rajmahal Coalfield area. Indian Journal of  Soil and Water Conservation, 25, pp.28-32

Google Scholar

32. Larney, F.J. and Angers, D.A., 2012. The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review. Can. J. Soil Sci., 92, pp.19-38 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss2010-064

Google Scholar

33. Li, Y.M., Chaney, R.L., Brewer, E.P., Roseberg, R.J., Angle, J.S., Baker, A.J.M., Reeves, R.D. and Nelkin, J., 2003. Development of a technology for commercial phytoextraction of nickel: Economic and technical considerations. Plant Soil, 249, pp.107-115 https://doi.org/10.1023/A :1022527330401

Google Scholar

34. Lindemann, W.C., Lindsey, D.L. and Fresquez, P.R., 1984. Amendment of mine spoils to increase the number and activity of microorganisms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Journal, 48, pp.574-578 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800030021x

Google Scholar

35. Madejon, E., de Mora, A.P., Felipe, E., Burgos, P. and Cabrera, F., 2006. Soil amendments reduce trace element solubility in a contaminated soil and allow regrowth of natural vegetation. Environment Pollution, 139, pp.40-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.04.034

Google Scholar

36. Maiti, S.K., 2003. MoEF Report, an assessment of overburden dump rehabilitation technologies adopted in CCL, NCL, MCL, and SECL mines (Grant no. J-15012/38/98-IA IIM)

Google Scholar

37. Maiti, S.K. and Ghose, M.K., 2005. Ecological restoration of acidic coal mine overburden dumps-an Indian case study. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 13, pp.361-369 https://doi.org/10.2462/09670513. 637

Google Scholar

38. Manivannan, S., Sikka, A.K., Priya Devi, S., Ashok Kumar, J., Singh, N.P. and Manjunath, B.L., 2016. Biological Reclamation of Iron Ore Overburdens. Technical Bulletin No. 57 ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa

Google Scholar

39. Mann, H.S. and Chatterji, P.C., 1979. ‘Impact of mining operation on the ecosystem in Rajasthan, India’, in  Wali, M.D. (ed.), Ecology and Coal Resource Development. New York: Pergamon Press https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-8365-4.50084-3

Google Scholar

40. Marrs, R.H., Roberts, R.D., Skeffington, R.A. and Bradshaw, A.D., 1981. Ecosystem development on naturally colonized china day wastes. II Nutrient compartmentation. J. Ecol., 69, pp.163-169 https://doi.org/10.2307/2259823

Google Scholar

41. Mechie A. and Sanches, D.L., 2010. The Environmental Impact of Mining in the State of São Paulo. Estudos Avançados, 24, pp.209-219 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142010000100016

Google Scholar

42. Mertens, J., Van Nevel, L., De Schrijver, A., Piesschaert, F., Oosterbean, A., Tack, F.M.G. and Verheyen, K., 2007. Tree species effect on the redistribution of soil metals. Environmental Pollution, 149, pp.173-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol. 2007.01.002

Google Scholar

43. Padmavathiamma, P.K. and Li, L. Y., 2007. Phytoremediation technology: Hyperaccumulation metals in plants. Water Air Soil Pollution, 184, pp.105-126 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9401-5

Google Scholar

44. Prad, R. and Chadhar, S.K., 1987. Afforestation of dolomite mine overburdens in Madhya Pradesh. Journal of  Tropical  Forestry, 3, pp. 124-131

Google Scholar

45. Prasad, R. and Pandey, R.K., 1985. Natural plant succession in rehabilitated bauxite and coal mine overburden of Madhya Pradesh. J. Trop. For., 1, pp.309-320

Google Scholar

46. Pulford, I.D. and Watson, C., 2003. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land trees-a review. Environmental International, 29, pp.529-540 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00152-6

Google Scholar

47. Richards, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA-Agric Handbook no. 60. U.S. Printing Office, Washington, DC https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195408000-00012

Google Scholar

48. Russel, W.B., 1985. Vascular flora of abandoned coal-mined land, Rockey Mountain Foothills, Alberta. Naturalist, 99, pp.503-516

Google Scholar

49. Sheoran, A.S., Sheoran, V. and Poonia, P., 2008. Rehabilitation of mine degraded land by metallophytes. Mining Engineers Journal, 10, pp.11-16

Google Scholar

50. Sheoran, V., Sheoran, A.S. and Poonia, P., 2009. Phytomining: A review. Minerals Engineering, 22, pp.1007-1019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mineng.2009.04.001

Google Scholar

51. Singh, A.N. and Singh, J.S., 2006. Experiments on ecological restoration of coal mine spoil using native trees in a dry tropical environment, India. A synthesis. New Forests, 31, pp.25-39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11056-004-6795-4

Google Scholar

52. Skeel, V.A. and Gibson, D.J., 1996. Physiological performance of Andropogon gerardii, Panicum virgatum and Sorghastrum nutans on reclaimed mine spoil. Restoration Ecology, 4, pp.355-367 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526 -100X.1996.tb00188.x

Google Scholar

53. Smith, B.M., Diaz, A., Winder, L. and Daniels, R., 2005. The effect of provenance on the establishment and performance of Lotus corniculatus L. in a re-creation environment. Biological Conservation, 125, pp.37-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon. 2005.02.014

Google Scholar

54. Smith, J.A., Schuman, G.E., Depuit, E.J. and Sedbrook, T.A., 1985. Wood residue and fertilizer amendment of bentonite mine spoils: I. Spoil and general vegetation responses. Journal of Environmental Quality, 14, pp.575-580 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1985. 00472425001400040020x

Google Scholar

55. Solomon, T. and Moon, H., 2018. Expansion of Exotic Tree Species and Impacts on Management of the Indigenous Trees; Emphasis on Eucalyptus Species in Wolaita, South Ethiopia- A Review. International Journal of Research & Review, 5, pp.15-20

Google Scholar

56. Song, S. Q., Zhou, X., Wu, H. and Zhou, Y.Z., 2004. Application of municipal garbage compost on revegetation of tin tailings dams. Rural Eco-Environment, 20, pp.59-61

Google Scholar

57. Thomson, R., Vogel, W.G. and Taylor, D.O., 1984. Vegetation and flora of a coal surface-mine in Leurel country Kentucky, Castanea, 49, pp.111-126

Google Scholar

58. Tordoff, G.M., Baker, A.J.M. and Willis, A.J., 2000. Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere, 41, pp.219-228 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99) 00414-2

Google Scholar

59. Uresk, D.W. and Yamamoto, T., 1986. Growth of forbs, shrubs and trees on bentonite mine spoil under green house conditions. Journal Range Management, 39, pp.113-117 https://doi.org/10.2307/3899279

Google Scholar

60. Verma, P., Singh, S. and Verma, R.K., 2017. Impact of plantation on Iron Ore Mined Overburden at Durg in Chhattisgarh, India. International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6, pp.1-12

Google Scholar

61. Visser, S., Fujikawa, J., Griffiths, C.L. and Parkinson, D., 1984. Effect of topsoil storage on microbial activity, primary production and decomposition potential. Plant and Soil. 82, pp.41-50 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220768

Google Scholar

62. Voorhees, M.E. and Uresk, D.W., 1990. Effects of amendments on chemical properties of Bentonite mine spoil. Soil Science, 150, pp.663-670 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199010000-00001

Google Scholar

63. Williams, A.J, Singh R.B., Bhowmik, A.K., Singh, A.K. and Banerjee, S.K., 1994. Suitability of different tree species for Copper Mine Overburdens. Environment & Ecology, 12, pp.116-118

Google Scholar

64. Williamson, J.C. and Johnson, D.B., 1991. Microbiology of soils at opencast sites: II. Population transformations occurring following land restoration and the influence of rye grass/ fertilizer amendments. Journal Soil Science. 42, pp.9-16 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365 -2389.1991.tb00086.x

Google Scholar

65. Wu, C.Q., Lai, S.H., Xu, Y. Y., Xu, T. and Lei, J.L., 2008. ‘Application of 17 wild plant species in afforesting the abandoned quarry’, in D. Zhang, J. M. Lee and R. Tao (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Asian Plants with Unique Horticultural Potential, pp.501-508 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.769.73

Google Scholar

66. Yang, B., Shu, W. S., Ye, Z. H., Lan, C. Y. and Wong, M. H., 2003. Growth and metal accumulation in vetiver and two Sesbania species on lead/zinc mine tailings. Chemosphere, 52, pp.1593-1600 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00499-5

Google Scholar

67. Zhang, Z.Q., Shu, W.S., Lan, C.Y. and Wong, M. H., 2001. Soil seed bank as an input of seed sources in vegetation of lead/ zinc mine tailings. Restoration Ecology, 9, pp.1-8 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2001.94007.x

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Singh, S., 2020. Forestry Research in Mine Reclamation in India: Past, Present and Future . Indian Journal of Forestry, 43(1), pp.10-18. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-82P483

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 13 March 2020

Manuscript Revised on 09 June 2020

Manuscript Accepted on 18 June 2020

Manuscript Published on 07 January 2021

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: