1. Chazdon, R.L. (1998). Tropical Forests – Log ‘Em or leave’ Em?, Science, 281 (5381), 129-130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5381.1295
2. Curtis, J.T. and McIntosh, R.P. (1950). The inter-relationship of certain analysis and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497
3. Curtis, J.T. (1959). The Vegetation of Wisconsin – An Ordination of Plant Community, University Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 657.
4. Gupta, S.R. and Bharadwaj, B.B. (1983). Biomass productivity of forest ecosystem of Shivalik Hills. Journal of Tree Science, 12: 57-63.
5. Kushalpa, K.A. (1992). Saving Natural Forests. Indian Forester, 118(5): 344-348
6. Midgley, J.J. and Niklas, K.J. (2004). Does disturbance prevent total basal area and biomass in indigenous forests from being at equilibrium with the local environment? Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20: 595-597. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404001816
7. Mishra, R., Bankhwal, D.P., Pacholi, R.K. and Singh, V.P. (1998). Biomass status of mixed dry deciduous forest of Shivalik Hills. Indian Forester, 124(5): 287-291.
8. Negi, M.S. and Tandon, V.N. (1997). Biomass and nutrient distribution in an age sequence of Populas deltoides ecosystem in Haryana. Indian Forester, 123(2): 111-117.
9. Pande, P.K. (1999), Vegetation analysis and Sal regeneration in relation to their distrubances magnitude in some Sal forest. Trop. Ecol., 40(1): 25-36.
10. Pande, P.K. (2001). Structure of tropical dry deciduous Teak forests of Satpura plateau (India) with special emphasis on regeneration and disturbances. J. Trop. For. Sci., 13(2): 329-343.
11. Shanon, C.E. and Weiner, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University Illinois, Press, Urbana, USA, pp. 117.
12. Singh, J.S. (2000). Tropical Dry forest: Properties emerging from case study of Vindhyan Hills, (Proff. D.D. Nautiyal Commemoration Volume) Recent Trends in Botanical Researches (ed. D.K. Chauhan), pp. 243-254.
13. Singh, L. and Singh, J.S. (1991). Species structure, Dry matter dynamics and carbon flux of a dry tropical forest in India. Annals of Botany, 68: 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088252
14. Singh, R.P. and Chaturvedi, O.P. (1983), Primary Production of a Deciduous Forest at Varanasi. Indian Forester, 109: 255-260.
15. Singh, R.P., Rana, B.S. and Chaturvedi, O.P. (1987). Biomass Estimate, Net Primary Production and Dynamics of Nitrogen and Phosphorous in Shorea madhuca, dry deciduous forest of Varanasi. Indian Journal of Tree Science, 6: 68-73
16. Singh, J.S., Singh, S.P., Saxena, A.K. and Rawat, Y.S. (1984). The forest vegetation of silent valley India. Tropical Rain Forests. The Leeds Symposium, pp. 25-52.
17. Tandon, V.N., Rawat, J.K. and Singh, R. (1993). Biomass production and mineral cycling in plantation ecosystems of Eucalyptus hybrid in Haryana. Indian Forester, 119(3): 232-235.
18. Upadhyay N.K. (1998). Working Plan of South Gonda Forest Division, Saryuvratt, pp. 13-118.
19. Williams, N. (1998). Study Finds 10% of the tree species under threat. Science, 281 (5382), 1426. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5382.1426