Research Article | Published: 01 March 2013

Changes in Indian Himalayan Region: Impact on Forest Ecosystems and Implications for REDD+

Satya Prakash Negi

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 36 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 1-8 | 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2013-CGE9VJ | Cite this article

Abstract

There has been a rising global awareness about the importance of world’s mountain areas as mountains offer diverse goods and services to well over half of the earth’s 7 billion people. Mountains and mountain areas are susceptible in nature as some of the most visible indicators of climate change come from mountain areas e.g. widespread retread of glaciers have been observed from the mountain areas across the globe. The Indian Himalayan Region (IHR), a mountain chain along the northern border of India with its diversity of ecosystems has unique and special significance for India. During the last decades, globalization, climate change, and population growth have impacted the forest ecosystems of IHR. Although, there is a net gain (2.10%) of forest cover in IHR during the decade (2001 - 2011), but all the states of IHR did not gain in forest cover during the period. Moreover, changes within the forests, such as changes of undisturbed primary forests into secondary forests are difficult to assess. The overall forest cover of 41.55% of the total geographical area of IHR is way behind the target set by the National Forest Policy of 1988 (Anon; 1988). Protection of Himalayan forests is possible only if the ever growing inhabitants of the IHR are properly compensated for protection of these valuable national resources. Successful implementation of Sustainable Forest Management through the global initiatives like ‘reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries’ (REDD+) at sub-national level is an opportunity to protect the IHR for the national interest.

Keywords

Vulnerable, Forest cover, Disasters, Deforested, Emissions, Sustainable management

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Anon. (1988). National Forest Policy of India. Govt. of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi. http://moef.nic.in/divisions/fp/nfp.htm (Accessed on 07/06/2012).

2. Anon. (2009). Governance for Sustaining Himalayan Ecosystem: Guidelines and Best Practices. G.B.Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development. Govt. of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi. http://gbpihed.nic.in/G-SHE_Book.pdf (Accessed on 05/06/2012)

3. Chatterjee, S., Saikia, A., Dutta, P., Ghosh, D., Pangging, G., and Goswami, A.K. (2006). Background Paper on Biodiversity Significance of North East India for the Study on Natural Resources, Water and Environment Nexus for Development and Growth in North Eastern India. WWF-India, New Delhi. http://mdoner.gov.in/writereaddata/sublink3images/40.pdf (Accessed on 20/06/2012)

Google Scholar

4. CPF (2012). SFM and the Multiple Functions of Forests, SFM Fact Sheet -1.  Collaborative Partnership on Forests. http://www.cpfweb.org/32819045ba23e53cbb67809cef3b724bef9cd0.pdf (Accessed on 16/06/2012)

5. CPF (2012). SFM and REDD+, SFM Fact Sheet - 2. Collaborative Partnership on Forests.  http://www.cpfweb.org/3282607a76ac1e5c8e0b0172dcb023cf375303.pdf (Accessed on 16/06/2012).

6. FAO (2009). Mountains and Climate Change: From Understanding to Action. FAO, Rome. http://www.cde.unibe.ch/userfiles/Fullversion_low_Mountains_and%20_Climate_Change.pdf (Accessed on 25/02/2013).

Google Scholar

7. FAO (2011). Why Invest Sustainable Mountain Development? FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2370e/i2370e.pdf (Accessed on 25/02/2013).

8. FAO (2012). Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. http://www.fao.org/forestry/ci/en/ (Accessed on 08/06/2012).

9. FSI (2001). State of Forest Report, 2001. Forest Survey of India. Govt. of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi.

10. FSI (2005). State of Forest Report, 2005. Forest Survey of India. Govt. of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi

11. FSI (2011). India State of Forest Report, 2011. Forest Survey of India. Govt. of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi

12. ICIMOD (2012). India-Basic Information. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu. http://www.icimod.org/?q=india (Accessed on 05/06/2012).

13. IIASA (2009). IIASA Policy Brief: The Challenges for the Indian Forestry Sector. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/resources/publications/IIASAPolicyBriefs/pb05-web.pdf (Accessed on 25/02/2013).   

Google Scholar

14. IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html (Accessed on 12/02/2013).

Google Scholar

15. ITTO (2012). Criteria & Indicators. http://www.itto.int/feature04/ (Accessed on 08/06/2012).

16. McMorran, R., and Price, Martin F. (2011). Why Focus on the World’s Mountain Forests?  Mountain Forests in a Changing World - Realizing values, addressing challenges. FAO, Rome. http://www.mountainpartnership.org/fileadmin/user_upload/mountain_partnership/docs/FAO_Mountain-Forests-in-a-Changing-World.pdf (Accessed on 15/02/2013)

Google Scholar

17. Nandy, S.N., Dhyani, P.P., and Samal, P.K. (2006). ENVIS Monograph 3 - Resource Information Database of the Indian Himalaya. G.B.Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development. Government of India, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi

Google Scholar

18. NAPCC (2008). National Action Plan on Climate Change. Prime Minister’s Council on Climate Change, Government of India. http://www.indiaclimateportal.org/the-napcc (Accessed on 05/06/2012).

Google Scholar

19. Negi, S.P. (2008). Trans-Himalayan Cold Desert Tribal Community: Their Tryst with Ecological Sustenance. Wastelands News. May-June, 5-7

20. Negi, S.P. (2009). Forest Cover in Indian Himalayan States-An Overview. Indian J. For. 32(1), 1-5

Google Scholar

21. Parker, C., Mitchell, A., Trivedi, M., Mardas, N., and Sosis, K. (2009). The little REDD+ Book. Global Canopy Programme. http://www.globalcanopy.org/sites/default/files/lrb_en_0.pdf (Accessed on 10/02/2013).

Google Scholar

22. Registrar General & Census Commissioner (2012). Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi. http://censusindia.gov.in/ (Accessed on 15/05/2012).

23. Samal, P.K., Palni, L.M.S, and Agarwal, D.K. (2003). Ecology, Ecological Poverty and Sustainable Development in Central Himalaya Region of India. Intern. J. Sustainable Dev. & World Ecol., 10, 157-168.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500309469794

Google Scholar

24. Schild, A., and Banskota, K. (2008). Changes and Challenges in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya: Implications for ICIMOD. Sustainable Mountain Development in the greater Himalayan region. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu. http://lib.icimod.org/record/26300/files/c_attachment_523_4854.pdf (Accessed on 15/02/2013).

25. Shreshtha, U.B., Gautam, S., and Bawa, K.S. (2012). Widespread Climate Change in the Himalayas and the Associated Changes in Local Ecosystems. PLoS ONE, 5, 1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036741

Google Scholar

26. Singh, J.S. (2006). Sustainable development of the Indian Himalayan Region: Linking Ecological and Economic Concerns. Curr. Sci., 6, 784-788

Google Scholar

27. UNCED (1992). Agenda 21: Programme of Actions for Sustainable Development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro. http://www.scribd.com/doc/36820157/Agenda21-Earth-Summit-the-United-Nations-Programme-of-Action-From-Rio (Accessed on 05/06/2012).

28. UNEP (2009). Vital Forest Graphics. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/vitalforest/ (Accessed on 26/02/2013).

29. UNFCCC (2012): United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/2860.php (Accessed on 16/06/2012)

30. UNGA (2008). 62/98. Non-legally Binding Instrument on All Types of Forests. UN General Assembly, Sixty-Second Session Second Committee Agenda Item 54. A/RES/62/98. 31 January, 2008. United Nations General Assembly. http://www.fao.org/forestry/14717-03d86aa8c1a7426cf69bf9e2f5023bb12.pdf (Accessed on 16/06/2012).

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Negi, S.P., 2013. Changes in Indian Himalayan Region: Impact on Forest Ecosystems and Implications for REDD+. Indian Journal of Forestry, 36(1), pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2013-CGE9VJ

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 March 2013

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: