1. Anon. (1997). Report of the Committee for Sal Borer Affected Areas of M.P. Submitted to Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India. 20 pp.

2. Anon. (1998a). First Report of Steering Committee on Sal Borer. Submitted to Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India. 20 pp.

3. Anon. (1998b). Report of Task Force on Sal Borer Attack in Madhya Pradesh. Submitted to Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India. 23 pp.

4. Bajpaee, H.V. (1982). Working Plan for the Sal Forests of Mandla District, M.P. Govt. of Madhya Pradesh. 455 pp.

Google Scholar

5. Beeson, C.F.C. (1941). The Ecology and Control of Forest Insects of India and Neighbouring Countries. Vasant Press, Dehra Dun. 1107 pp.

6. Browne, F.G. (1968). Pests and Diseases of Forest Plantation Trees. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1330 pp.

Google Scholar

7. Gardner, J.C.M. (1941). Immature stages of Indian Lepidoptera. 2. Noctuidae, Hypsidae. Indian Forest Rec. (N.S.), 6: 253-298.

Google Scholar

8. Gardner, J.C.M. (1948). On larvae of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera) – IV. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond., 99: 291-318.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1948.tb01239.x

Google Scholar

9. Hampson, G.F. (1894). The Fauna of British India Including Ceylon and Burma. Moths-Vol. II. 1976 edition. Today and Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers. 609 pp.

Google Scholar

10. Holloway, J.D. (1985a). The moths of Borneo : Family Noctuidae : Subfamilies Euteliinae, Stictopterinae, Plusiinae. Malay. Nat. J., 38: 157-317.

Google Scholar

11. Holloway, J.D. (1985b). Moths of Borneo. Part 14– Noctuidae, Euteliinae to Pantheinae. Malayasian Nature Society, Southdene, Kuala Lumpur, 317 pp.

Google Scholar

12. Mathur, R.N. (1942). On the biology of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). Indian For. Rec. (NS), 7: 74-154.

Google Scholar

13. Mathur, R.N. and Singh, B. (1960). A list of insect pests of forest plants in India and adjacent countries. Indian For. Bull. (Ent.), 171(8): 1-88.

14. Nair, K.S.S. (1988). The Teak defoliator in Kerala, India. In : Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations (edited by A.A. Berryman), Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, p. 267-289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0789-9_14

Google Scholar

15. Nylin, S.; Wiklund, C.; Wickman, P.O. and Garcia-Barros, E. (1993). Absence of trade-offs between sexual size dimorphism and early male emergence in a butterfly. Ecology, 74(5): 1414-1427.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1940071

Google Scholar

16. Roychoudhury, N. and Joshi, K.C. (1995). Larval feeding habits and moulting behaviour of Hyblaea puera Cramer on Teak. Adv. For. Res. India, 12: 228-233.

17. Roychoudhury, N. and Joshi, K.C. (2001). Teak defoliators : their outbreak and impact in Central and South India. ENVIS For. Bull., 1(1): 21-23.

Google Scholar

18. Sevastopulo, D.G. (1941). On the food-plants of Indian Agaristidae and Noctuidae (Heterocera). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 42: 421-430.

Google Scholar

19. Stebbing, E.P. (1914). Indian Forest Insects of Economic Importance - Coleoptera. Reprint edition 1977. J.K. Jain Brothers, Bhopal. 648 pp.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9203

Google Scholar

20. Tewari, D.N. (1995). A Monograph on Sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.). International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun, 276 pp.

Google Scholar