Research Article | Published: 01 March 2005

Status Review of Namdapha National Park, India: Need for Strengthening Community-Conservation Linkages

Panna  Deb and Rakesh Chandra Sundriyal

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 28 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 85-96 | 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2005-LO5BIX | Cite this article

Abstract

The North East India is among the most significant global hotspots of biodiversity, and state of Arunachal Pradesh covers 32% of total area of the region. In comparison to the other neighbouring states and countries, large areas of the State of Arunachal Pradesh are under intact forest cover that provides unique opportunity to conserve biodiversity within the protected areas. This paper analyses the status of biodiversity and management of Namdapha National Park, which is also a Tiger Project and is under the active consideration of Biosphere Reserve Status. The Park falls among the select relict rainforest patches of high global significance, and has been identified as an epicenter of high endemism and biodiversity with over 1119 plants and 1399 faunal species in an area of 1985 km2 (elevation variation 200-4570 m above sea level). It also provides unique habitats to four Wild Cats (Tiger, Leopard, Snow Leopard and Clouded Leopard) and only Ape (Hollock Gibbon) in India, thus conservation of this Park has larger implications not only for India but for whole of the South-east Asian countries. There has been communities living around the Park, a few settlements within the Park area are of major concern for the conservation of biodiversity. Besides, grazing, hunting, and NTFPs collections, particularly in the fringe areas, are other major threats to the biodiversity of the Park. The management suffers due to lack of proper infrastructure, enough manpower and trained personnel, which has been a major constraint in recent times. The paper highlights the need of strengthening community conservation linkages by educating people and addressing the issues of settlement, NTFP collection and hunting involving local communities in the management of Park around its buffer zone I addition to building capacity of Park management staff. Preparing comprehensive eco-development programmes for different areas and communities in and around the Park is an important issue to address long-term management of the area.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Anon. (1995). Centres for Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for their Conservation. WWF and IUCN, IUCN Publication Unit, Cambridge, UK.

Google Scholar

2. Anon. (1994). Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN – The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.

3. Anon. (1990). Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi.

4. Anon. (2003). National Wildlife Database. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun.

5. Anon. (2001). Arunachal Pradesh: Provisional population Tables, Series-13, Paper-3: Distribution of workers and Non-workers. Census of India, Directorate of Census Operations, Arunachal Pradesh.

6. Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Govt. of India Press, Nasik.

Google Scholar

7. Chauhan, A.S.; Singh, K.P. and Singh, D.K. (1996). A Contribution to the Flora of Namdapha, Arunachal Pradesh, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, India.

Google Scholar

8. Dhar, U. (1997) (ed). Himalayan Biodiversity – Action Plan. Himavikash Publication No. 10, G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmai, Almora, India.

9. Dinerstein, E. (1997). A Framework for Identifying High Priority Areas and Actions for Conservation of Tiger in the Wild. WWF, WCS, NFWF.

Google Scholar

10. Ghosh, A.K. (1997). Qualitative Analysis of Faunal Resources of Proposed Namdapha Biosphere Reserve, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India.

Google Scholar

11. Jain, S.K. and Sastry, A.R.K. (1980). Threatened Plants of India –A State of Art Report. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, India. 

Google Scholar

12. Khoshoo, T.N. (1992). Plant Diverstiy in the Himalaya: Conservation and Utilization. Pandit Gobind Ballabh Pant Memorial Lecture II. P. 129, G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, India.

13. McCann, K.S. (2000). The Diversity – stability Debate. Nature, 405:228-233.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35012234

Google Scholar

14. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mitterneier, C.G.; da Fonseca, G.A.B. and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature, 43:853-858.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

Google Scholar

15. Proctor, J.; Haridasan, KI. And Smith, G.W. (1998). How far does Lowland Evergreen Tropical Rainforest go?. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 7:141-146.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2997817

Google Scholar

16. Rai, S.C. and Sundriyal, R.C. (1997). Tourism Development and Biodiversity Conservation in Sikkim Himalaya. Ambio., 26(4):234-242.

Google Scholar

17. Rao, R.R. and Hajra, P.K. (1986). Floristic Diversity of the Eastern Himalaya – in a Conservation Perspective. Proc. Of Indian Academy of Sciences (Animal/Plant Sci.) Suppl. (November), pp. 103-125.

Google Scholar

18. Rao, R.R. (1994). Biodiversity in India, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun.

Google Scholar

19. Rawat, G.S. (1997). Floristic diversity and Gap Analysis for the Himalayan Region. Report Unpublished, WWF, Nepal Programme.

20. Ringu, P. (2002). An action plan for the strengthening protected area network and eco-development in Arunachal Pradesh. In: Arunachal Pradesh: Environmental Planning and Sustainable Development (eds. Sundriyal, R.C.; Singh, T. and Sinha, G.N.), Himavikash Occasional Publication No. 16, 2002, pp. 249-254.

Google Scholar

21. Rodgers, W.A. and Panwar, H.S. (1988). Planning a Wildlife Protected Area Network in India. Wildlife Institute, Dehra Dun.

Google Scholar

22. Sharma, E. and Sundriyal, R.C. (2001). Eastern Himalayan Biodiversity: Importance, Threats, and Conservation Initiatives. In: Tropical Ecosystem: Structure, Diversity and Human Welfare. Proc. Of the International Conference on Tropical Ecosystems (eds. Ganeshaiah), N., Uma Shanker, R. and Bawa, K.S.) pp. 615-618. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

23. Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Deb, P. and Sundriyal, R.C., 2005. Status Review of Namdapha National Park, India: Need for Strengthening Community-Conservation Linkages. Indian Journal of Forestry, 28(1), pp.85-96. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2005-LO5BIX

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 March 2005

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: