1. Banerjee, S.P. and Badola, K.C., 1980. Nature and properties of some Deodar (Cedrus deodara) forest soils of Chakrata forest division, U.P. Indian Forester, 106(8), pp.558-560.

Google Scholar

2. Batjes, N.H., 1996. Total carbon and soil nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 47, pp.151-163.

Google Scholar

3. Cihacek, L.J. and Ulmer, M.G., 1997. Effect of tillage on profile soil carbon distribution in the Northern great plain of the U.S. In: Soil Management and Green House Effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp.83-91.

Google Scholar

4. Devi, B., 2011. Biomass and carbon density under natural and plantation ecosystems in mid hill subhumid conditions of Himachal Pradesh. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Hort. & Fort., Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India.

Google Scholar

5. Gupta, M.K., Jha, M.N. and Singh, R.P., 1991. Organic carbon status in silver fir and spruce forest soils under different silvicultural systems. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 39, pp.435-440.

Google Scholar

6. Gupta, P.K., 2000. Soil, Plant, Water and Fertilizer Analysis. Published by Agrobios (India), Chopasani Road, Jodhpur.

7. IPCC, 1996. Revised IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Reference Manual, Vol. 3. United States.

Google Scholar

8. IPCC, 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, In Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C.A. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

Google Scholar

9. Jacob, J., 2005. The science, politics and economics of global climate change: Implications for the carbon sink projects. Current science, 89(3), pp.464-474.

10. Mahlman, J.D., 1997. Uncertainties in projections of human caused climate warming. Science, 278, pp.1416-1417.

Google Scholar

11. Nayak, B.K., 1996. Studies on biomass productivity and nutrient content in Eucalyptus tereticornis, Leucaena leucocephala and Melia azedarach under high density plantation. M.Sc. Thesis. Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Hort. & Fort., Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India.

Google Scholar

12. Pressler, M., 1895. Das Gesetz der Stambildung Leipzig. pp.153.

Google Scholar

13. Sharma, P.K., Verma, T.S. and Bhagat, R.M., 1995. Soil structural improvement with the addition of Lantana camara biomass in rice wheat cropping. Soil Use and Management, 11, pp.199-203.

Google Scholar

14. Smith, D.M., 1954. Maximum moisture content method for determining specific gravity of small wood samples. US For. Prod. Lab. Rep., Report No. 2014, Madison, Wisconsin.

Google Scholar

15. Sheikh, M.A., Kumar, M., Todaria, N.P. and Pandey, R., 2020. Biomass and soil carbon along altitudinal gradients in temperate Cedrus deodara forests in Central Himalaya, India: Implications for climate change mitigation. Ecological Indicators, 111.

Google Scholar

16. Verma, R.K. and Kapoor, K.S., 2017a. Estimation of biomass and soil carbon stock in mixed forest of Abies pindrow Royle – Picea smithiana (Wallich) Boiss. and Betula utilis D. Don forest of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Forest., 40(2), pp.117-120. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2017-7EL3VP

Google Scholar

17. Verma, R.K. and Kapoor, K.S., 2017b. Biomass and soil carbon stock in Cedrus deodara and Quercus semecarpifolia forest of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. In Tewari, V.P. and Sharma, R. (eds). Forestry in India: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. HFRI, Shimla. pp.155-160. 

18. Walkley, A.J. and Black, I.A., 1934. Estimation of soil organic carbon by chronic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, pp.29-38.