Research Article | Published: 07 January 2021

An ecological appraisal of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. (Chir pine) and Shorea robusta Gaertn. (Sal) plantations in Doon valley

Subramanian Sivaranjani and Vijender Pal Panwar

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 43 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 107-113 | 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-R7N9FU | Cite this article

Abstract

The present study focused on phyto-sociological and physico-chemical attributes of soil in Pinus roxburghii (Chir pine) and Shorea robusta (Sal) plantations in a reserved estate of New Forest, Dehradun. A total of 33 plant species comprising of 18 trees, 10 shrubs and five herbs were recorded from the study area. The tree density, in chir pine was lower 950 individuals/ ha as compared to 1073 individuals/ ha in sal vegetation. In saplings, high density was observed for Syzygium cumini (20 individuals/ 100m2) in sal followed by Broussonetia papyrifera (19 individuals/100m2) in chir pine plantation. Lantana camara, marked its presence with highest density (49 individuals/100 m2) in chir pine followed by Clerodendrum infortunatum (18 individuals/100 m2) in sal plantation. Higher tree basal cover (51 m2/ha) was recorded in sal than chir pine (19 m2/ha). Similarly, the tree diversity in sal was recorded higher (1.68) as compared to chir pine (1.51) plantation. Contrarily, sapling diversity was higher (2.81) in chir pine as compared to sal (2.52) plantation. Herbaceous flora was completely absent in sal plantation. Analysis of size class distribution revealed that sal trees (~ 29%) attained 21-30 cm diameter whereas chir pine trees (68%) were under 11-20 cm diameter class mainly due to preferred growing zone of the species and habitat suitability. The soil under chir pine was slightly acidic (5.98) with sandy loam texture. Soil was comparatively good with higher soil organic carbon (2.71%) under sal plantation mainly due to high humus deposition. It is suggested to restrict wide spread of Lantana camara in chir pine plantation for the better growth of the species and enhance nutrient availability.

Keywords

Size class distribution, Soil organic carbon, Species diversity, Tree density

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Banerjee, S.K., Singh, S.B., Nath, S. and Banerjee, S.P., 1986. Comparison of some physicochemical properties of soils of varying age plantations of Cryptomeria japonica. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 34, pp.357-61

Google Scholar

2. Bray, R.H. and Kurtz, L.T., 1945. Soil-phosphorus extraction methodologies: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(5), pp.159-161

Google Scholar

3. Currie, D.J. and Francis, A.P., 2004. Regional versus climate effect on taxon richness in Angiosperms: reply to Qian and Ricklefs. American Naturalist, 163, pp.780-785 https://doi. org/10.1086/383596

Google Scholar

4. Curtis, J.T., 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

Google Scholar

5. Curtis, J.T. and Cottom, G., 1950. Plant Ecology Work Book. Laboratory Field Reference Manual. Burgess Publication Co., Minnesota https://doi.org/10.1086/383596

Google Scholar

6. Curtis, J.T.  and McIntosh, R.P., 1950. The  interrelations  of  certain analytical and synthetic phyto-sociological characters. Ecology, 31, pp.434 https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497

Google Scholar

7. Dhanai, C.S. and Panwar, V.P., 1999. Role of aspect and soil on the structure and composition of Quercus floribunda natural stands in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Forester, 125(12), pp.1204-1213

Google Scholar

8. Dhanai, C.S. and Panwar, V.P., 2008. Impact of aspect and soil on the structure and composition of Quercus glauca natural stands in Himalayan subtropical forest. Annals of Forestry, 16 (1), pp.25-32

9. Dhanai, C.S., Panwar, V.P. and Sharma, C.M., 2000. Effect of aspect and soil on the structure of Quercus leucotrichophora natural stands in Western Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry, 23(3), pp.349-356

Google Scholar

10. Divakara, B.N., 2015. Floristic analysis, phytosociological studies and regeneration status of tree species in sal forests of Jharkhand, India, in XIV world forestry congress Durban, South Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286443392

Google Scholar

11. Futuyma, D.J., 1998. Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO 9780511781193.003

Google Scholar

12. Gairola, S., Rawal, R.S. and Todaria, N.P., 2008. Forest vegetation patterns along an altitudinal gradient in sub-alpine zone of West Himalaya, India. African Journal of Plant Science, 2(6), pp.042-048

Google Scholar

13. Gaur, R.D., 1982. ‘Dynamics of vegetation of Garhwal Himalayas’, in Paliwal G.S. (ed.), Vegetational Wealth of the Himalayas, Puja Publishers, New Delhi

Google Scholar

14. Givnish, T.J., 1999. On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. Journal of Ecology, 87, pp.193-210 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2745.1999.00333.x

Google Scholar

15. Gonzalez-Espinosa, M., Rey-Benayas, J.M., Ramirez-Marcial, N., Huston, M.A. and Golicher, D., 2004. Tree diversity in the northern Neotropics: regional patterns in high diverse Chiapas, Mexico. Ecograph, 27, pp.741-756 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906- 7590.2004.04103.x

Google Scholar

16. Gupta, R.S., 1951. Recurrence in drought conditions in mortality in sal forests of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society, 40(1), pp.25-33

Google Scholar

17. Hanway, J.J. and Heidel, H., 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College, Soil Testing Laboratory, Iowa State College Bull. 57, pp.1-131

Google Scholar

18. Jackson, M.L., 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

Google Scholar

19. Khan, N., Ahmed, M., Siddiqui, M., Bibi, S. and Irshad, A., 2012. A phytosociological study of forest and non-forest vegetation of district Chitral, Hindukush Range of Pakistan. Fuuast Journal of Biolojgy, 2(1), pp.91-101

Google Scholar

20. Lal, B. and Lodhiyal, L.S., 2015. Vegetation structure, biomass and carbon content in Pinus roxburghii Sarg. dominant forest of Kumaun Himalaya. Environment and We An International Journal of Science & Technology, 10, pp.117-124

Google Scholar

21. Lavorel, S. and Garnier, E., 2002. Predicting the effects of environmental changes on plant community composition and ecosystem functioning: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology, 16, pp.545-556 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x

Google Scholar

22. Leigh, E.G., 1965. On the relation between productivity diversity and stability of a community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 53, pp.777-783 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.53.4.777

Google Scholar

23. Lodhiyal, L.S., Lodhiyal, N. and Pathak G.C., 2016. ‘Plant diversity and vegetation composition of Shiwalik forests along an altitudinal gradient in the Kumaun Himalaya, India’, in: R. Chand and W. Leimgruber (eds.), Globalization and Marginalization in Mountain Regions, Perspectives on Geographical Marginality 1, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-32649-8_16

Google Scholar

24. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D. and Wardle, D.A., 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, pp.804-808 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064088

Google Scholar

25. Misra, R., 1968. Ecological workbook. Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publishing Company

Google Scholar

26. Mittelbach, G. G., Schemske, D. W., Cornell, H. V., Allen, A. P., Brown, J. M., Bush, M. B., Harrison, S.P., Hurlbert, A.H., Knowlton, N., Lessios, H.A.,  McCain, C.M., McCune, A.R., McDade, L.A.,  McPeek, M.A.,  Near, T.J., Price, T.D., Ricklefs, R.E., Roy, K., Sax, D.F., Schluter, D., Sobel, J.M. and Turelli, M., 2007. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology letters, 10(4), pp.315-331 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01020.x

Google Scholar

27. Mori, A.S., Lertzman, K.P. and Gustafsson, L., 2017. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(1), pp.12-27

Google Scholar

28. Naidu, M.T. and Kumar, O.A., 2016. Tree diversity, stand structure, and community composition of tropical forests in Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 9(3), pp.328-334 https://doi.org /10.1016/j.japb.2016.03.019

Google Scholar

29. Norton, B.A., Thomson, L.J., Williams, N.S.G. and McDonnell, M.J., 2014. The effect of urban ground covers on arthropods: an experiment. Urban Ecosystem, 17, pp.77-99 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.japb.2016.03.019

Google Scholar

30. Odum, E.P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders and Co. Philadelphia

Google Scholar

31. Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F. and Dean, L., 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, USDA Circular Nr 939, US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.

Google Scholar

32. Ossola, A., Nash, M.A., Christie, F., Hahs, A.K. and Livesley, S.J., 2015. Urban habitat complexity affects species richness but not environmental filtering of morphologically-diverse ants. Peer J 3:e1356 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1356

Google Scholar

33. Phillips, E.A., 1959. Methods of Vegetation Study, A Holt Dryden Book. Henry Hott and Co. Inc

Google Scholar

34. Pielou, E.C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, pp.131-144 https://doi.org/10.3126/hjs.v1i2.207

Google Scholar

35. Pokhriyal, P., Uniyal, P., Chauhan, D. and Todaria, N., 2010. Regeneration status of tree species in forest of Phakot and Pathri Rao watersheds in Garhwal Himalaya. Current Science, 98(2), pp.171-175

Google Scholar

36. Ram, J., Kumar, A. and Bhatt, J., 2004. Plant diversity in six forest types of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya. India. Current Science, 86(7–10), pp.975–978

Google Scholar

37. Risser, P.G. and Rice, E.L., 1971. Diversity in tree species in Oklahoma upland forest species. Ecology, 52, pp.876-880 https://doi. org/10.2307/1936036

Google Scholar

38. Sagar, R. and Singh, J.S., 2005. Structure, diversity, and regeneration of tropical dry deciduous forest of northern India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(4), pp.935-959 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0671-6

Google Scholar

39. Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S., 1984. Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest associations and implication concerning their future composition. Vegetatio, 58, pp.61-69 https://doi. org/10.1007/BF00044928

Google Scholar

40. Shannon, C. and Wiener, E., 1963. The mathematical theory of communications. Univ. Illinois. Urbana, pp. 117

Google Scholar

41. Sharma, C.M., Gairola, S., Ghildiyal, S.K. and Suyal, S., 2010. Physical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of the Central Western Himalaya. Journal of Forest Science, 26(2), pp.117-129

Google Scholar

42. Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, pp.688 https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Google Scholar

43. Simpson, G.G., 1964. Species diversity of North American recent mammals. Systematic Zoology, 13, pp.57-73 https://doi. org/10.2307/sysbio/13.1-4.57

Google Scholar

44. Singh, B., Nath, S., Das, P.K., Singh, S.B. and Banerjee, S.K., 1987. Soil characteristics under introduced Cryptomeria japonica (Dhupi) in Darjelling himalayan region. Indian Forester, 113(3), pp.191-201

Google Scholar

45. Singh, J., Rajasekaran, A., Negi, A.K. and Panwar V.P., 2016. Wild edible plant diversity in Pinus gerardiana Wall. ex D. Don forests of Kinnaur district, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Forestry, 39(1), pp.13-20

Google Scholar

46. Singh, N., Tamta, K., Tewari, A. and Ram, J., 2014. Studies on vegetational analysis and regeneration status of Pinus roxburghii Roxb. and Quercus leucotrichophora forests of Nainital Forest Division. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 14(3), pp.41-47

Google Scholar

47. Singh, R., 1976. Structure and net community production of the herbaceous vegetation in the sand dune regions around Pilani, Rajasthan. Ph.D. Thesis, BITS Pilani, Rajasthan

Google Scholar

48. Singh, R. and Joshi, M.C., 1979. Floristic composition and lifeforms of sand dune herbaceous vegetation near Pilani, Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Ecology, 6, pp.9-19

Google Scholar

49. Soni, P., Vasistha, H.B. and Kumar, O.M., 1994. ‘Revegetation of abandoned limestone mine in Mussoorie hill’, in Prakash, R.(ed.), Advances in Forestry Research in India, International Book Distributers, Dehradun

Google Scholar

50. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L.,  1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils, Current Science, 25, pp.259-260

Google Scholar

51. Suoheimo, J., 1995. Natural regeneration potential of mixed sal (S. robusta) forests in Nepal,  Vol II. FMUDP working paper no 18. Kathmandu: National Forest Division, Department of Forests, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, HMGN

Google Scholar

52. Tewari, J.C., 1982. Vegetational analysis along altitudinal gradients around Nainital. Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaon University, Nainital, India

Google Scholar

53. UNESCO, UNEP and FAO, 1978. Tropical forest ecosystem: A state of knowledge report. UNESCO, Paris, France

Google Scholar

54. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of degt jareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, pp.29-37 https://doi.org/10.2307/3673255

Google Scholar

55. Whittaker, R.H., 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, pp.213-251 https://doi.org/10.2307/3673255

Google Scholar

56. Whittaker, R.H., 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. 2nd ed. Mac. Milliam Pub. Co. New York

Google Scholar

57. Wiens, J.J. and Donoghue, M.J., 2004. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness.  Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, pp.639-644 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011

Google Scholar

58. Wilde, S.A., Voigt, G.K. and Iyer, J.G., 1964.  Soil and plant analysis for tree culture. In: Soil and Plant Analysis for Tree Culture. Oxford Publishing House

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Sivaranjani, S. and Panwar, V.P., 2020. An ecological appraisal of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. (Chir pine) and Shorea robusta Gaertn. (Sal) plantations in Doon valley. Indian Journal of Forestry, 43(2), pp.107-113. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-R7N9FU

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 02 September 2020

Manuscript Revised on 24 December 2020

Manuscript Accepted on 30 December 2020

Manuscript Published on 07 January 2021

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: