Research Article | Published: 01 December 2013

Phytosociological Analysis of Forest Vegetation of Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand

Kalpna  Mungali and Hema Joshi

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 487-502 | 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2013-U18DB3 | Cite this article

Abstract

Present study was carried out in Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand during the period 2006-2007 Phytosociologcal study of the vegetation was conducted on the basis of floristic and structural variations. The diversity of trees, shrubs and herbs varied with Beats and Compartments. For example in South Binsar Block maximum tree diversity was recorded in Binsar Beat and minimum in Patanainail Beat. In North Binsar maximum diversity was recorded in Dhaulchina Beat and minimum in Satri Beat. In Rithagar Block the diversity was Zero. The maximum value of concentration of dominance for tree layer was observed in Patnainail Beat and minimum in Badaur Beat (in South Binsar). This value also varied with Beats and Compartments of Sanctuary.

Keywords

Shannon-Wienar information function, Simpson’s index, Basal cover, Concentration of dominance, Diversity dominance

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Adhikari, B.S., Rikhari, H.C., Rawat, Y.S. and Singh, S.P. (1991). High altitude forest composition, diversity and profile structure in a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Tropical Ecology, 32: 86-97

Google Scholar

2. Bhandari, B.S., Mehta, J.P., Nautiyal, B.P. and Tewari, S.C. (1997). Pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) Community along an altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya. Int. Jour. Ecol. and Environ. Sci. 23: 67-74

Google Scholar

3. Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Govt. of India Publ, Delhi

Google Scholar

4. Curtis, J.T. (1959). The Vegetation of Wisconsin. An Ordination of Plant Communities. Uni. of Wisconsin Press, Maddsson, Wisconsin

Google Scholar

5. Curtis, J.T. and Cotton, G. (1956). Plant Ecology Work-Book-Laboratory and Field Reference Mannual. Burgesses Pub. Co., Minnesota

Google Scholar

6. Curtis, J.T. and McIntosh, R.P. (1950). The interrelations of L.C. Certain analytic synthetic phytosociological characters, Ecology, 31: 434-455.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497

Google Scholar

7. Gaur, R.D. (1982). Dynamics of Vegetation of Garhwal Himalaya. In; Paliwal (Ed.). The Vegetational Wealth of India, 12-15

Google Scholar

8. Kershaw, K.A. (1973). A survey of the Vegetation in Zaria Province in Nigeria. Vegetatio. 15: 244-268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01956135

Google Scholar

9. Knight, D.H. (1975). A phytosociological analysis of species rich tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island. Panama. Ecol. Monogr. 45: 259-284.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1942424

Google Scholar

10. Misra, R. (1968). Ecology Workbook. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co, New Delhi

Google Scholar

11. Odum, E.P. (1971). Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia, USA

Google Scholar

12. Philips, E.A. (1959). A Laboratory Blocks. D.C. Heath and Co. Boston

13. Ralhan, P.K., Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). Analysis of Forest Vegetation at and around Nainital in Kumaun Himalaya. Proc. Nat. Sci. Acad. B. 48 : 121-137

Google Scholar

14. Rana, B.S., Singh, S.P. and Singh, R.P. (1989). Biomass and net primary productivity in Central Himalayan forest along an altitudinal gradient. Forest Ecology and Management. 27: 199-218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(89)90107-2

Google Scholar

15. Risser, P.G. and Rice, E.L. (1971). Diversity in tree species in Oklahoma upland forests. Ecology. 52: 876-880.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1936036

Google Scholar

16. Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetation, 50: 3-22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120674

Google Scholar

17. Shannon, C.E. and Wienner, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana Uni. Press. Illinois

Google Scholar

18. Simpson, E.H. (1949), Measurement of Diversity, Nature. 163: 688.  https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Google Scholar

19. Singh, S.K. (1989). Studies on Biomass, Phytosociology and Productivity of Shai Devi Forest, West Almora University, Nainital

Google Scholar

20. Singh, S.P. and Singh, J.S. (1985). Man and Enviroment. The Central Himalayan Case. Biol. Mem. 11(1): 47-59

Google Scholar

21. Singh, S.P. and Singh, J.S. (1986). Structure and Function of Central Himalayan Oak forest Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. (Plant). 96: 159-89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053301

Google Scholar

22. Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1992). Forests of Himalaya: Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital

Google Scholar

23. Tiwari, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1987). Analysis of forest land use and Vegetation in a part of Central Himalaya using aerial photographs. Environ. Conser, 14(3): 233-244.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016441

Google Scholar

24. Tripathi, S.K., Verma, K.R., and Upadhyay, V.P. (1987). Analysis of forest vegetation at Kasar Devi Hills of North-West Almora Divison in Kumaun Himalalya. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. (Pl. Sci). 97 (3): 265-276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053352

Google Scholar

25. Upreti, N., Tiwari, J.C. and Singh, S.P. (1985). Oak forests of Kumaun Himalaya: Composition, diversity and regeneration. Mt. Res. Dev. USA. 163-174.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3673255

Google Scholar

26. Whittakar, R.H, (1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant Communities. Science. 147: 250-260.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3655.250

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Mungali, K. and Joshi, H., 2013. Phytosociological Analysis of Forest Vegetation of Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Forestry, 36(4), pp.487-502. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2013-U18DB3

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 December 2013

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: