Research Article | Published: 01 June 2010

Impact of different forest plantations and cropping systems on reclamation of Sodic soils

K. P. Tripathi and Bajrang Singh

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 33 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 135-142 | 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2010-VZ7X22 | Cite this article

Abstract

Transformation of barren lands into productive ecosystems needs an intensive effort to develop desired land use systems, corresponding to degree of soil deterioration. In highly sodic soils, several constraints viz. high pH and ESP, low carbon and nitrogen, poor water permeability, a low microbial diversity, crusting, hard setting of Kankar pan (Ca CO3 layer) in sub-soil, interfere to the root penetration and plants growth and unless the soil is locally amended to some extent, cropping is difficult. Chemical treatment of soils with gypsum or pyrite is usually in practice for cropping which does not lead to a stable reclamation and quite a few instances are available for resodification when the cultivation is dropped for a few years. Such threats can be countered with raising the perennial plantations. Monoculture and agroforestry raising crops for commercial interest and mixed forest for environmental conservation are the two available options for adopting in balance proportions. Reclamation of sodic soil is a slow process and it cannot offset the adverse soil conditions completely even in last 4-5 decades. However some invasive species were found to be relatively more efficient in a speedy recovery such as Prosopis juliflora and Leucaena leucocephalla. Although annual cropping and afforestation both reclaim the soil but in different ways. Forests provide a reconstructed community habitat for several biotas, whereas cultivations accomplish the societal demand. It would be useful to undergo for a better proportion after due consideration of site conditions, deterioration status, drainage, water logging management, and salt tolerance potentials of the crops/plants to be considered.

Keywords

Transformation, Productive ecosystems, Land use systems, Environmental conservation, Cropping, Afforestation, Invasive species

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Abrol, I.P. and Bhumbla, D.R. (1971). Saline and alkali soils in India – their occurrence and management. World Soil Resources, FAO Report, 41: 42-51.

Google Scholar

2. Batra, L., Kumar, A., Manna, M.C. and Chhabra, R. (1997). Experimental Agriculture, 33: 389-397.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479797004067

3. Brookes, P.C., Landman, A., Pruden, G. and Jenkinson, D.S. (1985). Chloroform fumigation and release of soil N: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass N in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 17: 837-842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0

Google Scholar

4. Brookes, P.C., Powlson, D.S. and Jenkinson, D.S.  (1982). Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 14: 319-321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(82)90001-3

Google Scholar

5. Chopra, S.L. and J.S. Kanwar, (1982). Analytical Agriculture Chemistry. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India.

Google Scholar

6. Garg, V. K. (2000).  Bioreclamation of sodic waste land a case study. Land Degradation and Development, 11: 487-498.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-145X(200009/10)11:5<487::AID-LDR409>3.0.CO;2-C

Google Scholar

7. Garg, V. K. and Jain, R.K. (1992). Influence of fuel wood trees on sodic soils. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22: 729-735.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-098

Google Scholar

8. Garg, V.K. (1998). Interaction of tree crops with sodic soil environment: potential for rehabilitation of degraded environments. Land Degradation and Development, 81-93.   https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199801/02)9:1<81::AID-LDR267>3.0.CO;2-R

Google Scholar

9. Garg, V.K. (1999). Leguminous trees for rehabilitation of sodic wastelands in northern India. Restoration Ecology, 7: 281-287.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72021.x

Google Scholar

10. Garg, V.K. and Jain, R.K. (1996). Effect of fuel wood plantations on some properties of sodic wastelands. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 9: 194-205.

Google Scholar

11. Garg, V.K. and Singh, B. (2003). Macronutrient dynamics and use efficiency in three species of short rotation forestry developed on sodic soils in north India. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 15 (2): 289-302.

Google Scholar

12. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

13. Jain R.K. and Garg, V. K. (1996). Effect of decade old tree stands on some properties of soils while revegetation sodic wastelands. Indian Forester, 122: 467-475.

Google Scholar

14. Jain, R.K. and Singh, B. (1998). Biomass production and soil amelioration in a high density Terminalia arjuna plantation on sodic soil. Biomass and Bioenergy, 15:187-192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00011-7

Google Scholar

15. Jain, R.K., Singh, B., Srivastava, N., Tripathi, K.P. and Behl, H.M. (2002a). Influence of tree growth on reclamation of sodic soils. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 72 (1): 39-41.

Google Scholar

16. Jain, R.K., Singh, B., Tripathi, K. P. and Srivastava, N. (2001). Reclamation of sodic soils in north. Indian Society of Soil Science, 50: 147-148.

Google Scholar

17. Jain, R.K., Singh, B., Srivastava, N., Tripathi, K.P. and Behl, H.M. (2002b). Amelioration in sodic soils by planting Albizia lebbeck benth. and Pithecolobium dulce Benth. Indian Journal of Forestry, 25 (2): 114-121.

18. Jenkinson, D.S. and Powlson, D.S.  (1976). The effect of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil – V. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 8: 209-213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5

Google Scholar

19. Kalara, Y.P. and Maynard, D.G. (1991). Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Information Report NOR-X-319. Northern Forestry Centre, Northwest Region, Forestry Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 106-107 pp.

Google Scholar

20. Khoshoo, T.N. (1987). Ecodevelopment of Alkaline Land Banthra a Case Study. NBRI-CSIR, Lucknow India, PID, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

21. Misra, P.N. and Tewari, S.K. (1999). On the performance of Poplars (Populus deltoides) on marginal soils in northern Indian. Biomass and Bioenergy, 16: 257-262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00066-X

Google Scholar

22. Piper, C.S. (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis, Adelaide, Australia

23. Quadir, M., Schubert, S., Ghafoor, A. and Murtaza, G. (2001). Land Degradation and Development, 12: 357-386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.458

24. Singh, B. (1998a). Contribution of forest fine root in reclamation of semiarid sodic soils. Arid soil Research and Rehabilitation, 12: 207-222.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15324989809381510

Google Scholar

25. Singh, B. (1989). Rehabilitation of alkaline wasteland on the Gangetic alluvial plains of Uttar Pradesh, India, through afforestation. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation, 1: 305-310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3400010406

Google Scholar

26. Singh, B. (1998b). Productivity dynamic of Populus deltoids clones a degraded Gangetic alluvium in north India. Journal Tropical Forest Science, 10: 478-493.

Google Scholar

27. Singh, B. (1998c). Biomass production and nutrient dynamics in three clones of Populus deltoides planted on Indogangetic plains. Plant and Soil, 203:15-26.

Google Scholar

28. Singh, B. and Behl, H.M. (1999).  Energy flow, carbon and nitrogen cycling in Populus deltoides clones in north India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 17: 345-356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00049-5

Google Scholar

29. Singh, B. and Behl, H.M. (2001). Scope of Populus deltoids on marginal lands of Indo-Gangetic plains. Indian Forester, 127: 91-100.

Google Scholar

30. Singh, B. and Misra, P.N. (1995). Biomass, energy content and fuel wood properties of Populus deltoides clones raised in north Indian plains. Indian Journal of Forestry, 18: 278-284.

Google Scholar

31. Singh, B. and Tripathi, S.S. (1993). Economic crop production through appropriate management of sodic soils of Aligarh (UP). In: Management of Productivity Constrained U.P. Soils, 36-41.

32. Singh, B., Tripathi, K.P., Jain, R.K. and Behl, H.M. (2000). Fine root biomass and tree species effects on potential N mineralization in afforested sodic soils. Plant and Soil, 219: 81-89.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004720826347

Google Scholar

33. Tripathi, K.P. and Singh, B. (2005). Role of revegetation for rehabilitation of sodic soils in semi arid sub tropical forest, India. Restoration Ecology, 13 (1): 29-38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00005.x

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Tripathi, K.P. and Singh, B., 2010. Impact of different forest plantations and cropping systems on reclamation of Sodic soils. Indian Journal of Forestry, 33(2), pp.135-142. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2010-VZ7X22

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 2010

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: