Research Article | Published: 01 December 2008

Biomass/productivity and nutrient retention in some Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. plantations of Punjab, India

Laxmi Rawat, S. K. Kamboj, Deepak Kholiya and Arun Kandwal

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 509-516 | 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-Y7H409 | Cite this article

Abstract

The biomass and nutrient distribution in Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Plantations of different ages (25-33 years) has been studied at six sites at Nara, Chaksadhu, Dhirowal, Kharkan, Dharamkot and Kamalpur of Hoshiarpur, Feerozpur and Amritsar Forest Division of Punjab. The biomass ranged from 83.56 kg tree-1 to 1516 kg tree-1 and from 85.42 to 1226.94 t ha-1 in all these sites. Productivity ranged from 2.59 t ha-1 yr-1 (at 33 yrs) to 9.28 t ha-1 yr-1 (at 25 yrs). The contribution of individual tree components to total biomass varied as: leaf 0.65 to 3.86%; twig 1.62 to 5.64%, branch 10 to 24.88%, bark 8.49 to 12.27%, root 14.98 to 20.58% and bole 42.98 to 58.76%. The percent contributions of all tree components in all the sites were in the order of bole > root > branch > bark > twig > leaf. Prediction models have been worked out by using allometric regressions. Among prediction variables tried D2H were found the most reliable parameters for prediction of biomass. The amount of various nutrients varied from N-691.12 to 2087.24 kg ha-1 P-26.33 to 98.05 kg ha-1, K-470.2 to 1305.4 kg ha-1, Ca-725.05 to 3306.38 kg ha-1 and Mg – 58.33 to 141.20 kg ha-1, respectively. The percentage contribution of different nutrients to total nutrients were as; N (24.57 to 42.41%), P (1.28 to 2.1%), K (16.69 to 31.95%), Ca (28.25 to 54.79%) and Mg (1.51 to 4.27%), respectively. Nutrient losses through complete harvesting have also been discussed and some suggestions have been made to replenish the nutrient loss and improve the site productivity.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Art, H.W. and Marks, P.L. (1971). A summary table of biomass and net annual primary production in forest ecosystems of the world. In: Forest Biomass Studies (ed. Young, HE). Life Sciences and Agricultural Experiment Station. Univ. of Maine, Orono, USA.

Google Scholar

2. Bisht, Smita (2000). Comparative studies on biomass, productivity and mineral cycling in plantation ecosystems of Dalbergia sissoo and mixed crops. Ph.D. Thesis, FRI Deemed Univ., Dehra Dun, pp. 198.

3. Gupta, S.R. and Rajvanshi, R. (1991). The effect of biotic & abiotic factors on litter decomposition in a tropical D. sissoo forest ecosystem. In: Advances in Management & Conservation of Soil Fauna. Proc. Of 10th International Soil Zoology Colloinium (eds. Veeresh G.K. Rajgopal D & Viraktamath CAJ), 491-495.

Google Scholar

4. Kittredge, J. (1944). Estimation of the amount of foliage of trees and stands. Journal of Forestry, 42:905.912.

Google Scholar

5. Kittredge, J. (1948). Interception and Stemflow. Forest Influences. McGraw Hill, Book. Co., New York, pp. 114.

Google Scholar

6. Negi, J.D.S., Sharma, S.C. and Bisht, A.P.S. (1988). Forest floor and soil nutrient inventories in an old growth Eucalyptus plantations. Indian Forester, 114(8):453-461.

Google Scholar

7. Pal, M.P. and Raturi, D.P. (1990). Biomass production and organic matter distribution partitioning in Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Grown in an energy plantation. J. of Tropical Forestry, 6(11):120-124.

8. Piper, C.S. (1942). Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay.

Google Scholar

9. Pritchett, W.L. (1979). Properties and Management of Forest Soilss. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Google Scholar

10. Rajvanshi, R. and Gupta, S.R. (1985a). Productivity and litterfall in a tropical D. sissoo Roxb. Forest. Journal of Tree Science, 4(2): 73-78.

Google Scholar

11. Rajvanshi, R. and Gupta, S.R. (1985b). Mineral Cycling in a tropical deciduous D. sissoo Roxb. Forest., Acta Oecologica, 6(3):247-262.

Google Scholar

12. Sehgal, J.L., Mandal, D.K. and Vadivelu, S. (1990). Agro-Ecological Regions of India. Technical Bulletin NBSS Publ. 24. National Bureau of Soil Survey and land Use Planning (ICAR) Nagpur, India. 73 pp.

Google Scholar

13. Sharma, D.C., Taneja, P.L. and Bisht, A.P.S. (1988). Biomass, productivity and nutrient cycling in a Dalbergia sissoo plantation. Indian Forester, 114(5):261-268.

Google Scholar

14. Singh, Omkar, Sharma, D.C., Negi, M.S. and Singh, Rajinder (1994). Leaf litter production and decomposition in D. sissoo and Bombax ceiba plantations of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Forester, 120(8):682-688.

Google Scholar

15. Vogel, A.I. (1961). Quantitative Inorganic Analysis Including Elementary Instrumental Analysis. Longmans, Green & Co., Ltd., London.

Google Scholar

16. Young, H.Y. and Gill, R.F. (1951). Determination of Magnesium of Plant Tissue with Thiozole Yellow, Anal. Chem., 23:751-754.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60053a020

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Rawat, L., Kamboj, S.K., Kholiya, D. and Kandwal, A., 2008. Biomass/productivity and nutrient retention in some Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. plantations of Punjab, India. Indian Journal of Forestry, 31(4), pp.509-516. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-Y7H409

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 December 2008

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: