Research Article | Published: 01 March 2011

Pre sowing seed treatment effect of bio-agents on seed germination and seedling vigour of Banjoak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus)

Birendra Prasad, Rajendra Prasad and V. K. Sah

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 34 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 71-74 | 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2011-Y7OMBY | Cite this article

Abstract

The present paper deals with bio-agents presowing seed treatment on the germination and subsequent seedling growth of Banjoak (Quercus leucotrichophora). The seeds were inoculated by Pseudomonas fluorescens (pf-173), Trichoderma harzianum @ 10 g/kg seed and mixture of both bio-agents for (5 g+ 5g) each of the same rate. All the inoculated treatments significantly influenced the germination and subsequent seedling vigour except the value for dry weight of seedling were at par with all treatments even control. The maximum value for germination, seedling height, total seedling length, collar diameter and vigour index II were observed for cumulative effect of both bio-agent while survival of the seedling, root length and below ground biomass were at par with Pseudomonas fluorescens treated seed. The significantly higher value for above ground biomass per seedling was found in Pseudomonas fluorescens treated seed and number of leafs per plant was recorded for Trichoderma harzianum.

Keywords

Rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas, Vigour index, Uprooted, Bio-fungicides, Inoculation

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Abdul-Baki, A.A. and Anderson, J.D. (1973). Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop. Sci. 13(6): 630-633.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x

Google Scholar

2. Barriuso, J., Ramos Salano, B., Santamaria, C., Daza, A. and Gutierrez Manero, F.J. (2008). Effect of inoculation with putative plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from Pinus spp. on Pinus pinea growth, mycorrhization and rhizosphere microbial communities, J.Appl. Microbiol. Nov., 105(5): 1298-1309.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03862.x

Google Scholar

3. Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India Publication, New Delhi, pp. 404

Google Scholar

4. Durman, S., Menendez, A. and Godeas, A. (1999). Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as antagonists of Rhizoctonia solani as bio-control of green house tomato plant. Revista Argentina de Microbiologia., 31: 13-18.

5. Etebarian, H.R., Scott, E.S. and Wicks, T.J. (2000). Trichoderma harzianum T 39, Trichoderma harzianum DAR 74290 as potential biological control agents for Phytophthora erythroseptica. European J.Pl. Pathol., 106: 329-337.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008736727259

Google Scholar

6. Haffland, E., Hakulinen, J. and Van Pelt, J.A. (1996). Comparison of systemic resistance induced by a virulent and non pathogenic Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology, 86: 757-762.  https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-86-757

Google Scholar

7. ISTA (1985). International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. and Technol., 13: 322-341.

Google Scholar

8. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR Publication, New Delhi, 167-174.

9. Puri, G.S., Meher-Homji, V.M., Gupta, R.K. and Puri, S. (1982). Forest Ecology Vol. I. 2nd edn. Phytogeography and Forest Conservation. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi. pp. 549.

10. Singh, R.S., Singh, D., Singh, H.V. and Singh, D. (1997). Effect of fungal antagonists on the growth of chickpea plants and will caused by Fusarium oxysporium f.sp. ciceri. Plant Dis.Res., 12: 103-107.

Google Scholar

11. Taylor, A.G. and Harman, G.E. (1990). Concept and technologies of selected seed treatment. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 28: 321-339.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.28.090190.001541

Google Scholar

12. Troup, R.S. (2003). The Silviculture of Indian Tree. Vol. III. IBD Publisher, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

13. Van Peer, R., Niemannand, G. J. and Schippers, D. (1991). Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas spp. strain WCS 417r. Phytopathology, 81: 728-733.   https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-81-728

Google Scholar

14. Vessey, K. (2004). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizer. Plant and Soil, 255(2): 571-586.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893

Google Scholar

15. Yehia, A.H., Abd-EL-Kader, D.A., Salem, D.E. and Sayed-Ahmed, A.A. (1994). Biological soil treatment with Trichoderma harzianum to control brown stem rot of soybean in Egypt. Egyptian J.Phytopathol. 22: 143-157.

Google Scholar

16. Yeole, R.D. and Dube, H.C. (1997). Increased plant growth and yield through seed bacterization. Indian Phytopathology, 50(3): 316-319.

Google Scholar

17. Yesmin, L., Oresnik, I. and Banerjee, M.R. (2004). Optimizing legume production using sulphur oxidizing bacteria and Rhizobium Consortia. 4th Int. Crop Sci. Congress, 26 Sep.- 10 Oct. held at Brisbane, Australia.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Prasad, B., Prasad, R. and Sah, V.K., 2011. Pre sowing seed treatment effect of bio-agents on seed germination and seedling vigour of Banjoak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus). Indian Journal of Forestry, 34(1), pp.71-74. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2011-Y7OMBY

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 March 2011

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: