Research Article | Published: 01 March 2009

Comparison of xylem resin from borehole and rill method of tapping in Pinus roxburghii

Chander Lekha and Kulwant Rai Sharma

Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Page No. 1-4 | 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2009-7S6Y74 | Cite this article

Abstract

Coniferous trees are rich in chemical compounds such as terpenes, fats/fatty acids, waxes, tannins and phenolics, which function to protect the tree against insect pests and diseases, and as energy reserves. Oleoresin is an important natural product that is a mixture of resins (diterpene acids) and volatile essential oils (mono- and sesquiterpenes) that serve as a solvent to maintain the oleoresin in a fluid state. The resin obtained from borehole method of tapping was free from impurities and oleoresin color was also clear in this method. On distillation of borehole oleoresin the rosin content of 67.11(55.02)% and turpentine contents of 32.30(5.68)% were obtained, whereas in other conventional method the rosin contents [75.25(60.18)%] were recorded to be higher and turpen-tine content [18.59(4.31)%] were lower than borehole method. The rosin obtained from borehole method oleo- resin was white in color and free from crystlization, whereas the rill method rosin was yellow to dark yellow in color. So, the borehole rosin is of better quality and fetch higher price in the market than other method oleoresin. The values of specific gravity, ash content and iron content were found to be 1.0258, 0.30(0.55)% and 3.37 ppm, respectively in borehole rosin, whereas the specific gravity, ash content and iron content of value 1.07315, 0.42(0.65)% and 5.81 ppm, respectively were recorded in rill method rosin. The major components of turpentine oil were alpha-pinene [34.13(5.84)%], and other terpenes [0.76(0.87)%], which were found to be significantly higher in borehole turpentine as compare to rill method, whereas non-significant difference has been observed for beta-pinene+delta-3 carene and longifolene among both the resins.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Anon. (1971). Seminar on the role of Pine resin in the economic and industrial development in India. Sympine, Technical Papers, Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi.

2. Bartlett, M.S. (1947). The use of traspiration. Biometrics. 3: 39-52.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3001536

Google Scholar

3. Bardyshev, I.I., Udarov, B.E., Bulgakov, A.N. and Kuladin, V.P. (1973). Chemical composition of tur­ pentine from oleoresin of individual pines collected in the normal way or once per season. Lesnoi Zhurnal. 16 (5): 118-120.

Google Scholar

4. Coppen, J.J.W. and Hone, G.A. (1995). Non-Wood Forest Products-2, Gum Navel Stores: Turpentine and Rosin from Pine Resin. FAO, Rome. 62p.

Google Scholar

5. Fialla, K.M. (1949). The Scientific Basis of Resin Tapping. ZbI ges. Forst-u-Holzw. 71(20/54): 221-237.

6. Hodges, A.W. (1995). Management strategies for a borehole resin production system in Slash pine. Dissertation submitted to University of Florida, Cainesville, FL.

Google Scholar

7. Hodges, A.W. and Johnson, J.D. (1997). Borehole oleo­resin production from Slash pine. South. J. Appl. For. 21(3): 108-115.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/21.3.108

Google Scholar

8. Kaushal, A.N. and Kashyap, S.D. (1980). High resin yielders m Chir pine and their economic importance. Procedings of National Symposium on Improvement of Forest Biomass, HPKVV, Solan.

9. Persad, V. (1983). Rill method of resin tapping and stor­age of resin obtained from Chir pine (P. roxburghii Sargent). M.Sc. Thesis, HPKVV, Palampur. 68 p.

10. Sharma, K.R. (1987). Tapping technique for oleoresin in Blue pine. Ph.D. Thesis, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P). 90p.

11. Tiwari, D.N. (1995). Forestry Statistics India. ICFRE, Dehradun (U.P.).

12. Zinkel, D. and. Russel, J. (1989). Naval Stores: Production, Chemistry, Utilization, Pine Chemicals Association, Atlanta, GA.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74075-6_26

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Lekha, C. and Sharma, K.R., 2009. Comparison of xylem resin from borehole and rill method of tapping in Pinus roxburghii. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 16(1), pp.1-4. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2009-7S6Y74

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 March 2009

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: