Research Article | Published: 01 September 1998

Ethnobotany of Muthuva tribe in the context of biodiversity rehabilitation at Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats of India

K. K. N. Nair and R. Jayakumar

Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3/4 | Page No. 159-172 | 1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-1998-E918G5 | Cite this article

Abstract

Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary lies within 10o 15' and 10o 22' North latitude and 77o 8' and 77o 18' East longitude, in Devikulam Taluk of Idukki District, Kerala State. The Sanctuary covers an area of 90.44 km2 in the Western Ghats of India and was established in 1984. The major vegetation types of the area are dry deciduous forests, thorny scrubs, riparian forests, shola forests and grasslands. The Sanctuary is also the abode of 11 tribal settlements of which 4 are of Hill-pulayas and 7 are of Muthuvas. Muthuva settlements are Thayannan-kudi, Iruttala-kudi, Vellakkal-kudi, Pathu-kudi, Olla-vayal, Oli-kudi and Mangappara, where a total of 642 Muthuvas reside at present. Traditionally, Muthuvas were hunter-gatherers, fully dependent on the forest resources of the area. Over-exploitation of several species by them coupled with degradation of the forests of the area due to various factors, the plant diversity of the Sanctuary had drastically declined.

In order to rehabilitate the biodiversity of the area by artifical regeneration of the species excessively exploited and rendered rare by the tribals, a study was undertaken to identify all the ethnobotanical species related to the traditional life of the Muthuvas. The survey had revealed that 83 species of wild plants are exploited by the tribals at present for their domestic use or for marketing. They also cultivate Lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus Wats.) on a large scale in addition to few other crops for sale of their products to meet their financial needs. Among the 83 ethnobotanical species of Muthuvas in the Sanctuary, few are excessively exploited by them and based on their role in the ecosystem functioning and also social linkages with the triabls, they have been designated as key-stone species in the context of biodiversity rehabilitation. The paper deals with the traditional lifestyle of Muthuvas, ethnobotanical species, their habit, part used, tribal uses, distribution in different settlement areas and also key-stone species identified for artificial regeneration and rehabilitation of the biodiversity of the Sanctuary.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Anonymous. (1951-76). The Wealth of India: Raw materials. 11 Vols. CSIR, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

2. Anonymous. (1980 & 1988). The wealth of India: Raw Materials (revised ed.). 2 Vols. CSIR, New Delhi.

3. Fosberg, F.R. and Schet, M.H. (1965). Manual for Tropical Herbaria. Regnum Vegetable 39. Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Google Scholar

4. Gamble, J.S. (1915-35). Flora of the Presidency of Madras. 3 Vols. Adlard & Sons Ltd., London.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.21628

Google Scholar

5. Henry, A.N., Kumari, G.R. and Chitra, V. (1987). Flora of Tamil Nadu, India. Series I. Analysis. Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore.

Google Scholar

6. Henry, A.N., Chitra, C. and Balakrishna, N.P. (1989). Flora of Tamil Nadu, India. Series I. Analysis. Vol. 3. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore.

Google Scholar

7. Hooker, J.D. (1872-97). Flora of British India. 7 Vols. Reeve & Co. Ltd., London.

8. IAPT. (1988). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Germany.

Google Scholar

9. Krishnamurthy, T. (1993). Minor Forest Products of India. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

10. Nair, K.K.N. (1997). A Manual of the Non-wood Forest Produce Plants of Kerala State, India. KFRI Research Report 115. KFRI, Peechi.

Google Scholar

11. Nair, K.K.N. (1997). A contribution to the bibliography of the angiosperm flora of Kerala State, India. J. Eco. Tax. Bot., 21: 441-462.

Google Scholar

12. Nair, N.C. and Henry, A.N. (1983). Flora of Tamil Nadu, India. Series I. Analysis, Vol 1. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore.

Google Scholar

13. Sebastine, K.M. and Vivekananthan, K. (1967). A contribution to the flora of Devikolam, Kottayam District, Kerala. Bull. bot. Surv. India, 4: 163-185.  https://doi.org/10.20324/nelumbo/v9/1967/76125

Google Scholar

14. Sajeev, K.K. and Sasidharan, N. (1997). Ethnobotanical observations on the tribals of Chinnar Wildlife Santuary. Ann. Pl. Sci., 16: 284-292.

Google Scholar

15. Sharma, B.D. and Balakrishnan, N.P. (ed.) (1993). Flora of India. Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.

Google Scholar

16. Sharma, B.D., Balakrishnan, N.P., Rao, R.R. and Hajra, P.K. (ed.) (1993). Flora of India. Vol.1. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.

Google Scholar

17. Sharma, B.D. and Sanjappa, M. (ed.) (1993). Flora of India. Vol. 3. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Nair, K.K.N. and Jayakumar, R., 1998. Ethnobotany of Muthuva tribe in the context of biodiversity rehabilitation at Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats of India. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 5(3/4), pp.159-172. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-1998-E918G5

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 September 1998

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: