Research Article | Published: 31 January 2022

Value chain analysis of some important medicinal plants in Madhya Pradesh, India

Pratibha Bhatnagar, Pramod Kumar Shukla and Rajesh Barman

Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products | Volume: 28 | Issue: 3 | Page No. 115-120 | 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2022-G38264 | Cite this article

Abstract

A study was undertaken to document supply and value chain of three important medicinal plants Embelia tsjeriam cottam, Celastrus paniculatus and Centratherum anthelminticum. Value chain analysis (VCA) was done from village level, district, regional to national level covering primary producers (n-144), market traders (n-20) and processors. Supply chains for three species were mapped and value chains covering most activities as produce moved across to industries were covered. The study revealed that the three species were mostly extracted from the wild and of these two species Embelia tsjerian-cottam and Celastrus paniculatus were facing depletion. There is an unfair margin to traders, with producers’ shares ranging between 35-50% which is low. Suggestions have been given to mitigate problems in the marketing channel.

Keywords

Baibidang (Embelia tsjeriam cottam), Demand, Malkangni (Celastrus paniculatus), Supply chain, Value chain analysis, Vanjeera (Centratherum anthelminticum)

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Alam, G. and Belt, J., 2009. Developing a medicinal plant value chain: lessons from an initiative to cultivate Kutki (Picrorhiza kurroa) in Northern India. KIT working papers series C5 Amsterdam.

Google Scholar

2. Bhatnagar, P., 2015. Report on Strengthening of MIS cell and establishment of five regional market data collection and analysis centres in Madhya Pradesh. State Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur. 

3. Bhatnagar, P. and Barman, R., 2017. Value chain of some important non-timber forest products in Madhya Pradesh. MIS report-6, State Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur. 

4. Bhatnagar, P. and Barman, R., 2020. Assessment of Demand and Supply of Some Important Medicinal Plants in Madhya Pradesh. J. Non-timber Forest Prod., 27(2), pp.113-116. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2020-4TEU2I

5. Chhabra, T., 2018. Value Chain Analysis for Medicinal Plant based products in India: Case Study of Uttarakhand. Arc Org Inorg Chem Sci., 4(1). AOICS.MS.ID.000176.

Google Scholar

6. Hishe, M., Asfaw, Z. and Giday, M., 2016. Review on value chain analysis of medicinal plants and the associated challenges. Journal of Medicinal Plants studies, 4(3), pp.45-55

Google Scholar

7. Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K. and Newton, A., 2006. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: first steps in analysing the factors influencing success in Mexico and Boliva. Research conclusions and policy recommendations for decision makers, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2006.

Google Scholar

8. MPVS, 2015. Document supply and value chains of major medicinal plants in select mandis and identify gaps and priorities for action by National Medicinal Plants Board of India, sponsored by UNDP, New Delhi, MPVS, and Bhopal.

9. Shahidullah, A.K.M. and Hague, E. Emdad, 2010. Linking medicinal plant production and livelihood enhancement in Bangladesh. Implications of a vertically integrated value chain. The Journal of Trans disciplinary studies, 9(2), pp.1-18

Google Scholar

10. Shinwari, Z.K. and Qaiser, M., 2011. Effort on conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants of Pakistan. Pak.J.Bot., 43, pp.5-10.

Google Scholar

11. Shukla, P. and Bhatnagar, P., 2019. Supply and value chains of medicinal plants, Non timber forest products: opportunities and challenges. Souvenir on International Herbal Fair, Bhopal, pp.11-14.

About this article

How to cite

Bhatnagar, P., Shukla, P.K. and Barman, R., 2021. Value chain analysis of some important medicinal plants in Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 28(3), pp.115-120. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2022-G38264

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 23 December 2021

Manuscript Revised on 31 December 2021

Manuscript Accepted on 17 January 2022

Manuscript Published on 31 January 2022

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: