Research Article | Open Access | Published: 10 March 2023

Reporting water quality of sustainable traditional ponds using water quality index in Nagaur district of western Rajasthan, India

Abhilasha Choudhary, Ramesh Chand Swami, Prakash Narayan and Vishal Kumar Sagtani

Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products | Volume: 29 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 174-180 | 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2023-X7PQW7 | Cite this article

Abstract

The present study investigates ancient water harvesting techniques of western Rajasthan and reports potable water quality by using the Water Quality Index (WQI). These small rain-fed ponds are still a significant water resource for the village community and quench the thirst for 6 to 10 months. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the water quality and its suitability for drinking, development of forest and irrigation purpose. There were four sampling sites that were analyzed seasonally for physico-chemical parameters including, pH, TDS, Fluoride, Nitrate, Chloride, Total Alkalinity, Total Hardness, Calcium and Magnesium over a period of one year from July, 2020 to June, 2021 in Nagaur district, Rajasthan. In the results, WQI indicated very poor and unsuitable drinking water quality in all seasons in the first sampling site located in the city due to poor management. Whereas, all the village sampling sites had excellent water quality index in terms of drinking in all seasons excluding one sampling site, which was showing poor water quality in summer. Calculations for WQI show that fluoride is the most influencing parameter in the study. The findings significantly enhance the understanding of the importance of these small water ponds and provide a base for making sustainable water strategies in present study areas.

Keywords

Fluoride, Ground water, Nadis, Physico-chemical parameters, Pollution, Water bodies, Water quality index

INTRODUCTION

Surface water ponds are valuable habitats; they offer essential services to all lives on Earth, although accounting for just 3% of the planet’s surface (Downing et al., 2006). Western Rajasthan is a region of the Thar Desert that experiences unpredictable rainfall and has an average daily requirement of 10 litres per person, with an additional 20 litres recommended for livestock (Hanlon, 2017). Our ancestors had known the importance of water for life, and several surface water conservation strategies have been constructed as rain-fed Nadis and Talab. According to a preliminary study, 42.4 per cent of potable water in villages in western Rajasthan has relied on Nadi, 34.7 per cent on Tanka, 15.0 per cent on wells and tube-wells, as well as 7.8 per cent on other supplies (Narain, Khan & Singh, 2005). There were 14,36,592 and 1,822 Nadis surveyed by the Central Arid Zone Research Institute (CAZRI) in Nagaur, Barmer and Jaisalmer, respectively. Nadis fulfils about 13% of the total demand for water in Nagaur district and 37.06% of total water demand in three districts. These reservoirs do not retain water throughout the year. Some of them become empty in critical summer. Human interference has deteriorated the natural quality of some of surface water reservoirs, and for this reason, these freshwater ponds are under pressure. Information on hydrology in the field, basin, region and state levels is scarce and, in many cases, unreliable in Rajasthan, specifically in the western area. Attempts must be made to create appropriate hydrological and water resource models for water management and utilization.

Horton developed the Water Quality Index (WQI) in 1965 as a method of computing all the physicochemical and biological aspects of water into a single number that would represent the water’s quality. There are twenty-one distinct WQI models identified in which mostly WQI models are analyzed in river systems (Uddin, Nash & Olbert, 2021). Pond water maybe categorized for its appropriateness for different applications based on the results of WQI (Chapman, 1996). The community has extensively used several of the water quality index methodologies for water quality assessments (Said, Stevens & Sehlke, 2004). US National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index, NSFWQI (Brown et al., 1972), Canadian Water Quality Index (CCME, 2001), British Columbia Water Quality Index, BCWQI (Zandbergen & Hall, 1998), Oregon Water Quality Index, OWQI (Cude, 2001) and the Florida Stream Water Quality Index, FWQI (SAFE, 1995) are very frequently used water quality indices in various parts of the world. It calculates the combined impact of several water quality variables and estimates surface and groundwater supplies for appropriate use by authorities and communities on a regular basis.

There is a need for more understanding of water quality standards in western Rajasthan since the rainy season is short and rainfall is sporadic in the region. Unsafe fluoride levels in the district’s groundwater have been identified in Nagaur through several investigations. In India, several recent studies revealed surface and groundwater quality by using water quality indices (Adimalla & Qian, 2019), (Karunanidhi et al., 2021), Adimalla, (2020). But no previous records of WQI were found on these semi-arid significant water resources.


STUDY AREA

All four-water reservoirs, under study, were situated in the Nagaur district, which lies between North latitudes 26°25’-27°40’ and East longitudes 73°10’-75°15’. It falls under the semi-arid Thar Desert and is characterized by thorny vegetation, frequent drought conditions with high concentration of nitrate and phosphorus in groundwater. Small ponds in the village are being used for consumption for both humans and livestock. During the monsoon period, the nadis and talab basin receive fresh water and are often built in conformity with existing topography, which acts as a natural catchment. In dune regions, nadis ranged in depth from 4 meters, with substantial seepage loss, smaller catchments, and lesser run-off. The first sampling site is the historical Jada Talab located in Nagaur city. The other three sampling sites are small ponds managed by the village communities and called Bungari Mata Mandir Talab (sampling site-2), Chimrani Nadi (sampling site-3), Imarti Nadi (sampling sites-4) after their village/locality name.



Figure 1.
Surface reservoirs selected in the study: (a.) Jada Talab; (b.) Bungari Mata Mandir Talab; (c.) Chimrani Nadi; (d.) Imarti Nadi.

 

METHODOLOGY

Physico-chemical parameter analysis

The observations were made from July, 2020 to June, 2021 from selected sampling site once in a month. Water samples were collected in 1000 ml plastic bottles that were thoroughly washed and dried before sample collection. After sample collection, proper labelling was done. With the help of a global positioning system (GPS) as shown in Fig. 1, the sampling locations were marked. The physico-chemical parameter such as pH, TDS, Fluoride, Nitrate, Chloride, Total Alkalinity, Total Hardness, biological oxygen demand (BOD) and dissolved oxygen (DO) were determined by following analytic standard procedures of the American Public Health Association. HANNA Hi 98,129 multimeter was used to measure the parameters in-situ, including pH, water temperature and total dissolved solids. Eriochrome Black T was used as an indicator while a titrant Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acectic acid (EDTA) was used to measure the total hardness in a buffer solution of ammonium chloride and ammonium hydroxide. Titrimetry was employed to measure alkalinity and methyl orange was used as an indicator. The reference solution contained 0.01 M of HCl. Complexometric titration was used to measure the concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and chlorine. Phenol disulphonic acid was used in a spectro-photometric technique to detect nitrate. Based on the idea that the presence of oxygen causes the divalent manganese in the testing sample to oxidize to its high valency, which happens as a brown hydrated oxide with the addition of KI and NaOH, Winkler’s method was used to determine the amount of dissolved oxygen. Fluoride ion concentrations and acceptable water standards are electrometrically quantified in water samples using the ion-specific electrode (ISE). According to standard operating procedures, standard solutions were used to pre-calibrate every instrument utilized for every analysis in order to ensure the accuracy and precision of observations. All of the electrodes were thoroughly cleaned with double-distilled water before each in-situ observation. Before each use, the probes should be conditioned in the sample for the best stabilization time. For the calibration of the rinsed and dry pH probes, freshly prepared buffer solutions of two different units were applied.


The Water Quality Index

The Water Quality Index is a 100-point scale that summarizes data from nine separate measurements and converts water quality into simple phrases (excellent, good, bad, extremely poor and inappropriate in Table 2). WQI might be an effective machine or tool for comparing the water quality of different sources of aquatic bodies’ index is extremely useful and crucial in relating the trend of water quality data with water quality monitoring. In present study, the data matrix was obtained from various seasons (summer, monsoon, post-monsoon and winter), to investigate the spatial and temporal variation in water quality and classify the pond water status (Table 1).

Table 1. Unit Weight (Wi) of different parameters and their standards used for WQI determination

 

BIS Standard Sn

Wn = K/Sn

pH

8.5

0.073489485

TDS

500

0.001249321

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

200

0.003123303

Total Hardness (mg/l)

300

0.002082202

Calcium (mg/l)

75

0.008328808

Magnesium (mg/l)

30

0.020822021

Chloride (mg/l)

250

0.002498642

Fluoride( mg/l)

1

0.624660621

Nitrate(mg/l)

45

0.013881347

DO

5

0.124932124

BOD

5

0.124932124

 

Table 2. Water Quality Rating as per Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index Method. (Source: Brown et al., 1972)

Water Quality Index

Water Quality Status

0-5

Excellent

26-50

Good

51-75

Poor

76-100

Very Poor

>100

Unfit for Consumption

 

Table 3. Various parameters in all seasons at four sites of Nagaur District (Rajasthan) duing June, 2020 to July, 2021

Parameters

Jada Talab

Bungari Mata Mandir Talab

Chmirani Nadi

Imarti Nadi

Rainy

Winter

Summer

Rainy

Winter

Summer

Rainy

Winter

Summer

Rainy

Winter

Summer

Water Temp. (oC)

23.3

13.1

22.25

23.3

15

22.2

23.3

13.3

21.25

23.3

13.9

21.55

pH

8.57

8.25

7.93

8.21

9.06

8.17

8.4

9.01

8.55

7.67

8.54

8.86

TDS

974

119

1362

81.5

96.2

144

89.25

107

198.2

85

110

293.2

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

172.25

202

198.5

32.5

38.7

62.5

31.25

37.5

72.5

33

45.2

125

Total Hardness (mg/l)

327.5

492

435

25

37.5

57.5

30

40

55

21.2

32.5

46.5

Calcium (mg/l)

70

83.2

123.5

10

15

30

10

20

30

10.5

14.2

20.5

Magnesium (mg/l)

38.7

67

142.7

10

20

35

20

20

27.5

10.7

18.2

25.75

Chloride (mg/l)

306.25

383

435.25

22.5

27.5

35

32.5

40

50

22.5

37.5

65

Fluoride ( mg/l)

0.82

1.05

1.38

0.16

0.13

0.18

0.1

0.12

0.21

0.22

0.21

0.62

Nitrate (mg/l)

13.58

51

73.5

0.84

4.58

8.17

3.97

4.58

12

4.31

5.88

24.5

DO

6.90

9.10

5.10

8.10

9.85

6.80

8.30

9.10

8.00

8.40

9.20

7.10

BOD

6.0

4.0

9.0

2.9

2.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

5.0

 

WQI Calculation (Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index Method)

Weighted arithmetic water quality index method classified the water quality according to the degree of purity by using the most commonly measured water quality variables. WQI was calculated with the ‘weighted arithmetic index method’ (Brown et al., 1972), using the formula:

∑ Qn Wn/ ∑ Wn

Step 1: Calculated the unit weight (Wn) factors for each parameter by using the formula:

Wn = K/(Sn)

Where:

K  = 1/(∑ 1/Sn)
Sn = Standard desirable value of the nth parameters

On summation of all selected parameters unit weight factors, Wn = 1(unit)

Step 2: Calculate the Sub-Index (Qn) value by using the formula:

Qn = Vn/Sn * 100

Vn= Standard desirable value of the nth parameter
Sn = Standard desirable value of the nth parameters

Step 3: Combining Step 1 & Step 2,

WQI is calculated as follows = Wn Qn

Overall WQI= ∑ Qn Wn/ ∑ Wn

Statistical and Graphs are made by Microsoft Excel.



Figure 2. Water Quality Index peaks in sampling sites of western Rajasthan in all seasons during 2020-2021.




Figure 3. Effect of change in fluoride on Water Quality Index (WQI).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Weighted arithmetic water quality index method was used to assess the water quality status of all four sampling ponds. The tool converts the water quality data into usable information, which express the level of water quality. First of all unit weight for each parameter is estimated to a common scale (Table-1). Standard values of drinking water quality according to BSI are used for the calculation of unit weight. WQI values with physicochemical parameters results of the water samples from all four sampling sites of all seasons are presented in Table 5.

Table 4. Correlation (r) amongst all parameters for all seasons with Water Quality Index (WQI)

S. No.

Parameters

‘r’ value

1

pH

0.2335

2

TDS

0.7965

3

Total Alkalinity (mg/l)

0.9623

4

Total Hardness (mg/l)

0.9224

5

Calcium (mg/l)

0.9496

6

Magnesium (mg/l)

0.891

7

Chloride (mg/l)

0.9575

8

Fluoride (mg/l)

0.9971

9

Dissolved oxygen(DO)

0.0787

10

Biological oxygen demand(BOD)

-0.0128

 

Table 5. Summary of Water Quality Index (WQI) of Sampled Sites

Season

Site

Water Quality Index

Water Quality Status

Rainy

Jada Talab

96.07461579

Very Poor

Bungari Mata Mandir

44.34977613

Good

ChimraniNadi

43.08634108

Good

ImartiNadi

46.61177116

Good

Winter

Jada Talab

112.6625793

Unfit for consumption

Bungari Mata Mandir

49.65603506

Good

ChimraniNadi

46.98300594

Good

ImartiNadi

50.40797551

Poor

Summer

Jada Talab

140.9207138

Unfit for consumption

Bungari Mata Mandir

47.18429505

Good

ChimraniNadi

53.55839253

Poor

ImartiNadi

81.21157399

Very Poor

 

The highest WQI value (140.92) is reported from sampling site-1 (Jada Talab) in summer whereas the lowest value (43.08) is found in sampling site-3 (Chimrani Nadi) in the rainy season. When analyzing these data seasons wise it is found that the highest WQI was reported in summer season, whereas, in rainy season, WQI value was reported lowest at all sampling sites. WQI reported the highest in sampling site-1 (Jada Talab) and values were observed at 96.07 (rainy), 112.66 (winter) and 140.92 (summer). These values indicated very poor and unsuitable water quality for drinking at this sampling site. On the other hand rest of all sampling sites excluding sampling site-4 (Imarti Nadi in summer) results showed good water quality as values are found below 50 in all seasons. At sampling site 4 in summer, WQI was found 81.21, which indicated the poor quality ofwater. However, the quality of the water is enhanced because of the diluting effect during the rainy season. Thus, it can be asserted that the water quality varies with the seasons and severe declines in some months (Isaac & Siddiqui, 2022). Zandagba et al. (2017) previously reported better water quality in rainy seasons than in winter and summer seasons.

These seasonal variations in WQI were potentially influenced by water physicochemical parameters (Jiang et al., 2018). In the study, Fluoride content was recorded highest (1.38 mg/l) in summer season in Jada Talab and lowest (0.10 mg/l) in Chimrani Nadi in rainy season. The pattern of fluoride levels gradually increased from rainy to summer season as recorded in all water bodies. Correlation between physic-chemical parameters and WQI is analyzed and it is shown that fluoride value has the highest linear positive correlation with WQI (r = 0.9971) at all sampling sites (Table 4). Besides this, WQI had the lowest positive correlation found with DO (r = 0.0787). Furthermore, BOD had negative correlation found with WQI (r = -0.0128). Figure 3 is showing WQI correlation with Fluoride in all seasons at all sampling sites, where Jada Talab sampling site has the highest value of WQI (140.89) with highest fluoride value (1.38). The physiochemical factors are responsible for abundant growth of Cynophycean bloom under high nutrient concentrations that can affect negative human health (Sharma et al., 2016).

CONCLUSION

The WQI of the four rain-fed water bodies in Nagaur district, Rajasthan ranged from 43.08 to 140.92. A high WQI above 75 was reported in the sampling site-1 (Jada Talab) located in city indicates poor water quality in terms of potable water. The water quality was reported better during the rainy seasons and decreases in winter and summer. The high value of WQI of this sampling site is mainly due to the ignorance of water conservation and populated catchment area. Besides this, all other village sampling sites have an excellent quality of water in all seasons except the sampling site-4 (Imarti Nadi), which has WQI above 50 in the summer season and shows poor quality of water due to exploitation of water in summer as it is not managed by any village community. Other village ponds are the best examples of conservation of water quality and ethics by village community from ancient times. Calculations for WQI show that fluoride is the most influencing parameter in the study. The determination of a water quality index is extremely valuable in assessing the quality of water as well as in water quality management. Our findings can also help decision-makers create plans for the most valued traditional water resources in western Rajasthan. It is advised that routine pond monitoring, de-weeding, and desilting should be performed on regular basis to maintain the pond’s value and protect it from possible harm.

Appendicies

Download PDF

References

1. Adimalla, N., 2020. Controlling factors and mechanism of groundwater quality variation in semiarid region of South India: An approach of water quality index (WQI) and health risk assessment (HRA). Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42, pp.1725-1752.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00374-8

Google Scholar

2. Adimalla, N. and Qian, H., 2019. Groundwater quality evaluation using water quality index (WQI) for drinking purposes and human health risk (HHR) assessment in an agricultural region of Nanganur, south India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 176, pp.153-161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.066

Google Scholar

3. Baird, R. and Bridgewater, L., 2017. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

Google Scholar

4. Brown, R.M., McClelland, N.I., Deininger, R.A., and O’Connor, M.F., 1972. A water quality index - Crashing the psychological barrier. Indicators of Environmental Quality, pp.173-182.   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2856-8_15

Google Scholar

5. Bureau of Indian Standards (B.I.S.), 2012. Drinking Water Standard 10500.

Google Scholar

6. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), 2001. Water Quality Index user’s manual.

7. Chapman, D.V., 1996. Water quality assessments: A guide to theuse of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring,Second edition. CRC Press, London.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003062103

Google Scholar

8. Cude, C.G., 2001. Oregon water quality index a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(1), pp.125-137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb05480.x

Google Scholar

9. Downing, J.A., Prairie, Y.T., Cole, J.J., Duarte, C.M., Tranvik, L.J., Striegl, R.G., McDowell, W.H., Kortelainen, P., Caraco, N.F., Melack, J.M. and Middelburg, J.J., 2006. The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnology and Oceanography, 51(5), pp.2388-2397.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2388

Google Scholar

10. Hanlon, P., 2017. Losing Faith: An Exploration of Village Ponds in the Thar Desert. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2742.

Google Scholar

11. Horton, R.K., 1965. An index number system for rating water quality. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 37(3), pp.300-306.

Google Scholar

12. Isaac, R. and Siddiqui, S., 2022. Application of water quality index and multivariate statistical techniques for assessment of water quality around Yamuna River in Agra Region, Uttar Pradesh, India. Water Supply, 22(3), pp.3399-3418.  https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.395

Google Scholar

13. Jiang, L., Li, Y., Zhao, X., Tillotson, M.R., Wang, W., Zhang, S.,Sarpong, L., Asmaa, Q. and Pan, B., 2018. Parameter uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of water quality model in Lake Taihu, China. Ecological Modelling, 375, pp.1-12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.014

Google Scholar

14. Karunanidhi, D., Aravinthasamy, P., Subramani, T. and Muthusankar, G., 2021. Revealing drinking water quality issues and possible health risks based on water quality index (WQI) method in the Shanmuganadhi River basin of South India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 43, pp.931-948.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00613-3

Google Scholar

15. Marella, R., 1995. Strategic assessment of Florida’s environment (SAFE). Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey.

16. Narain, P., Khan, M.A. and Singh, G., 2005. Potential for water conservation and harvesting against drought in Rajasthan, India. Working Paper 104 (Drought Series: Paper 7). International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Google Scholar

17. Said, A., Stevens, D.K. and Sehlke, G., 2004. An Innovative Index for Evaluating Water Quality in Streams Environmental Management, 34, pp.406-414.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0210-y

Google Scholar

18. Sharma, K.P., Sharma, S., Swami, R., Sharma, S., Rathore, G.S. and Singh, P.K., 2016. Limnological Studies of Mansagar Lake Following Restoration. Indian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(1/2), pp.1-34.

19. Uddin, M.G., Nash, S. and Olbert, A.I., 2021. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecological Indicators, 122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218

Google Scholar

20. Zandagba, J.E.B., Adandedji, F.M., Lokonon, B.E., Chabi, A., Dan, O. and Mama, D., 2017. Application use of Water Quality Index (WQI) and multivariate analysis for Nokoué Lake water quality assessment. American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 1(4), pp.117-127.

Google Scholar

21. Zandbergen, P.A. and Hall, K.J., 1998. Analysis of the British Columbia Water Quality Index for Watershed Managers: A Case Study of Two Small Watersheds. Water Quality Research Journal, 33(4), pp.519-550.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.1998.030

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Choudhary, A., Swami, R.C., Narayan, P. and Sagtani, V.K., 2022. Reporting water quality of sustainable traditional ponds using water quality index in Nagaur district of western Rajasthan, India. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 29(4), pp.174-180. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2023-X7PQW7

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 18 January 2023

Manuscript Revised on 03 March 2023

Manuscript Accepted on 07 March 2023

Manuscript Published on 10 March 2023

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: